FB pixel

IBM facial recognition contract provokes debate on specifics, and ‘general purpose’ fear

IBM facial recognition contract provokes debate on specifics, and ‘general purpose’ fear
 

A contract won by IBM last month to supply facial recognition technology to UK border security and law enforcement has prompted accusations that the company has abandoned prior commitments to limit its sale of the technology.

The contract with Home Office, originally listed as being for £65.6 million (US$84.4 million) but now corrected to £54.7 million (US$69 million), is to provide infrastructure and biometric matching for immigration controls, the issuance of passports and visas, and law enforcement investigations.

In 2020, IBM committed to cease selling “general purpose” facial recognition, and to avoid providing face biometrics for applications that involve “mass surveillance” or “racial profiling.”

The use of facial recognition for one-to-many matching violates those commitments, according to some observers among media and rights advocacy organizations. The Verge quotes representatives of Black Lives Matter UK and Amnesty international that the contract is a reversal by the U.S. tech giant. The latter claims that “research across the globe is clear; there is no application of one-to-many facial recognition that is compatible with human rights law.”

One-to-many facial recognition is used by border and law enforcement agencies in dozens of countries around the world, including the U.S. and UK.

“IBM no longer offers general-purpose facial recognition and, consistent with our 2020 commitment, does not support the use of facial recognition for mass surveillance, racial profiling, or other human rights violations,” IBM spokesperson Imtiaz Mufti told The Verge.

Further, Mufti argues that because the platform is not capable of ingesting video, it does not support typical mass surveillance operations.

An IBM policy paper makes clear that the company has been advocating for export controls and other regulation of 1:N facial recognition software since 2020, and uses but does not specifically define the term “general purpose IBM facial recognition and analysis products.”

Doing so now runs the risk of appearing to move the goalposts. More likely, it would be widely ignored.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Wrongful arrest in US linked to facial recognition error leads to $200K settlement

Jefferson Parish Louisiana Sheriff Joe Lopinto’s office has agreed to pay $200,000 to settle a federal civil rights lawsuit brought…

 

Social media age check warning by NZ regulator reflects fear beyond proposal

A New Zealand bill that mirrors Australia’s social media ban for users under 16 could lead to large scale data…

 

ID verification integration can stop fake employees, customers and bots: Persona

Fake job seekers have been flooding companies, relying on AI technology such as deepfakes to fool hiring managers and apply…

 

American mDL uptake suggests digital ID mass adoption caught in the slow lane

Mobile driver’s licenses (mDLs) are coming online as the first wave of government-issued digital IDs in the United States. The…

 

Biometrica pushes back on alleged privacy risks, biometric data concerns

A controversy brewing over the prospective adoption of a public security system from Biometrica that uses facial recognition in Milwaukee…

 

World announces expansion in Thailand as Indonesia blocks its services

World has announced it will expand its services in Thailand thanks to strategic partnerships with a total of 11 local…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events