FB pixel

Taking shots at the AI Act from the biometric sidelines

Taking shots at the AI Act from the biometric sidelines
 

A problem with trying to create a legislative super-regime like the EU’s AI Act is that every aspect of the law is so complex that anyone can mount a winning ideological attack on it.

The lawmaking is byzantine and fluid. Broad potential impacts on government functions, citizens and industry are really only understood by experts, who typically are not in government.

Few people outside the EU even know what the act’s finish line looks like or where it is.

So now, in the hoped-for waning days of the AI Act’s assembly, come critiques designed to destabilize it and its biometric provisions. Seemingly solid analysis is being flung to sway the dwindling number of politicians required for passage.

There is, for example, the little-known nonprofit Consumer Choice Center, a libertarian pressure group that has less to say for consumers and more to say for businesses selling to consumers.

Center officials say businesses will be too busy with compliance to innovate anymore. And no one outside the EU will follow the EU’s regulatory lead, leaving the union isolated and hamstrung as other players seek regulation that is more acceptable to industry.

Then there’s China, which the organization says ignore any market rules, even its own.

Even the American Civil Liberties Union, an organization not given to as much hyperbole, feels insufficient export controls of facial recognition and other facets of AI could be disastrous.

In an interview with the French news publisher RFI, an ACLU official criticized negotiators for dropping language that would make it illegal to sell overseas any algorithm that could not be sold in the union. Specifically named are facial and emotion recognition.

The official said European companies could find themselves facing a decision similar to Robert Oppenheimer, who directed the U.S.’ atomic bomb effort during the Second World War. Would it be better for the world to share the algorithms or for the EU to dominate?

These are difficult scenarios to contemplate and all the more so because the AI Act right now resembles an old-fashioned phone book.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

The UK’s election may spell out the future of its national ID cards

Identity cards are back among the UK’s top controversial topics – thanks to the upcoming elections and its focus on…

 

Challenges in face biometrics addressed with new tech and research amid high stakes

Big biometrics contracts and deals were the theme of several of the stories on that drew the most interest from…

 

Online age verification debates continue in Canada, EU, India

Introducing age verification to protect children online remains a hot topic across the globe: Canada is debating the Online Harms…

 

Login.gov adds selfie biometrics for May pilot

America’s single-sign on system for government benefits and services, Login.gov, is getting a face biometrics option for enhanced identity verification…

 

BIPA one step closer to seeing its first major change since 2008 inception

On Thursday, a bipartisan majority in the Illinois Senate approved the first major change to Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act…

 

Identity verification industry mulls solutions to flood of synthetic IDs

The advent of AI-powered generators such as OnlyFake, which creates realistic-looking photos of fake IDs for only US$15, has stirred…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read From This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events