FB pixel

No facial recognition in supermarkets, says Dutch data watchdog

No facial recognition in supermarkets, says Dutch data watchdog
 

No facial recognition for supermarkets but yes for nuclear power plants: The Netherlands’ data watchdog has published a guide explaining in which cases facial recognition can be used.

In the document, the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens), or DPA, lays out the most common legal questions related to facial recognition technology and processing biometric data.

The agency reiterated that introducing facial recognition tech into supermarkets would be a breach of Dutch privacy laws. The issue was raised in 2020 when an unnamed Dutch grocer attempted to introduce biometric surveillance to catch thieves and other people who could pose a threat, only to be prevented by regulators.

According to the legal framework, the supermarket would have to ask all customers for explicit permission to use facial recognition. In practice, however, that is virtually impossible, according to the DPA.

“The deployment of facial recognition is a substantial invasion of the privacy of all visitors and this outweighs the supermarket’s overriding private interests,” the agency notes.

Although the use of facial recognition is prohibited in most cases, the country does leave exceptions. One of them is the use of the technology for authentication or security purposes, such as ensuring the safety of a nuclear power plant or securing hazardous substances. To achieve this, however, a data protection impact assessment would have to prove that using facial recognition is in the public interest.

In the document, the agency defines conditions under which applying facial recognition can be considered “personal” or for “household use,” in which case the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not apply. One example is unlocking a phone with facial recognition. While the technology is allowed, the biometric data needs to be stored on the phone with the user deciding what happens to the data. Other options for unlocking the phone aside from biometrics must be provided, the agency says.

The DPA also confirmed that a ban on processing special personal data, which includes biometric and genetic data, is still valid in the case that facial recognition is used for confirming someone’s identity.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Reflections on the Global Digital Public Infrastructure summit 2024

The Global Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) summit 2024 has drawn attention to the transformative power of DPI in driving digital…

 

Binding physical and digital worlds with biometrics key to decentralized ID

Stakeholders in New Zealand’s digital identity ecosystem addressed the evolution of identity systems, particularly focusing on decentralized identity and biometrics…

 

Swedish police want to fight crime with live facial recognition

The Swedish police want to use facial recognition in real time to crack down on serious crimes. Government investigators have…

 

Biometrics cycle from innovations to scale-up opportunities

Biometrics integrations range from the experimental to the everyday in the most-read articles of the week on Biometric Update. Yesterday’s…

 

US Justice developing AI use guidelines for law enforcement, civil rights

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to advance draft guidelines for the use of AI and biometric tools like…

 

Airport authorities expand biometrics deployments with Thales, Idemia tech

Biometric deployments involving Thales, Idemia and Vision-Box, alongside agencies like the TSA,  highlight the aviation industry’s commitment to streamlining operations….

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events