FB pixel

Age assurance lobby gets busier with new Meta-backed coalition

CCME to advocate for ‘smartphone freedom,’ age assurance by app stores
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Age assurance lobby gets busier with new Meta-backed coalition
 

Washington has a new advocate for consumer choice in the smartphone ecosystem: a release announces the launch of the Coalition for a Competitive Mobile Experience (CCME), a group dedicated to combating “anti-competitive practices by smartphone platform owners that lock users into proprietary systems, limit choice, and increase costs for all consumers.”

The fearless defenders behind this initiative? The release lists, as founding members, Meta, Spotify, Match Group (owner of most of the big online dating apps) and consumer electronics maker Garmin.

The CCME dares not name the two mobile titans to which it alludes, saying only that, “while the smartphone ecosystem has provided consumers with great benefits, it has led to a duopoly where dominant platforms control the market and limit consumer choice to their own benefit.”

To those outside the coalition, that translates roughly as “we think Apple and Google have had their time in the sun, and should make room in the market for us.” But it also hides a potential weapon in the legal fight over online age checks.

The coalition says its guiding principles include hardware and software interoperability, a “level playing field in the app marketplace” and – lo and behold – age verification at the app store level, on the grounds that “it is where apps are purchased, and the app store already has the age data.”

So, while there’s little doubt that the CCME genuinely wants a bigger piece of the smartphone ecosystem, and believes “smartphone gatekeepers should not be permitted to discriminate against competing software, apps, or hardware (e.g. earbuds, watches, health wearables) by degrading or throttling the consumer experience,” the coalition also provides a convenient new vehicle to join the growing roster of lobby groups backed by big tech to lean on regulators as age assurance laws come into effect.

Coalition director Brandon Kressin has this to say: “Smartphones have become one of the most important tools in our daily lives, but the mobile experience is controlled by gatekeepers that have used their control of the market to stifle competition and choice at the expense of consumers. Leveling the playing field, increasing interoperability, and adding age-based content restrictions in the app store will give consumers the power they deserve, providing more freedom and access, all while lowering costs.”

The social media platforms’ argument for age assurance at the app store level now comes from at least three sides: NetChoice, which flogs the First Amendment; Chamber of Progress, which prizes “progressive society, economy, workforce, and consumer climate”; and the CCMC, which hoists the banner of consumer choice.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometric Update, Goode Intelligence release 2026 IAD report

Biometric Update and Goode Intelligence have released the “2026 Injection Attack Detection Market Report & Buyer’s Guide,” a new industry…

 

App store age brackets power California age assurance law, but where’s the proof?

California’s Digital Age Assurance Act may reshape how online services handle age data, but critics argue the law stops short…

 

Ghana joins growing list of countries pursuing online age verification

The Ghanaian government is working on a policy that would mandate age verification for access to age-restricted services like online…

 

Zambia deepens digital sovereignty push with Huawei AI partnership

The Zambian government is banking on a new partnership with Chinese tech giant Huawei to power digital government services across…

 

Australia builds enforcement layer behind age assurance laws

Australia is moving beyond age assurance mandates toward a broader legal framework designed to hold online platforms accountable for harms…

 

India pushes for strategic autonomy in biometrics, DPI and AI

Governments are increasingly pursuing technological sovereignty as concerns grow around dependence on foreign AI, cloud and biometric infrastructure. S. Krishnan,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events