FB pixel

Washington data privacy and facial biometrics legislation approved by state senate

 

Washington Senators have approved a new data privacy bill modeled on the European Union’s General Data Protection Rule by a 46-1 vote, local publication The News & Observer reports.

Companies using facial recognition must post signs informing the public about it, and can only take action based on matches produced by the technology after human review, under the new law. State agencies will need a warrant to use the technology, except in emergency situations. The bill also requires all businesses and other entities storing or processing personally identifiable data of more than 100,000 people to provide information about that data, as well as operate data correction and removal processes. Smaller companies would have a reduced set of obligations.

“We have an expectation and a right to privacy in the public square as well as our homes,” says Seattle Democrat Senator Reuven Carlyle, the bill’s sponsor.

Many Senate Republicans also voted for the bill. While Ferndale Republican Senator Doug Ericksen suggested that federal regulation would be preferable, and expressed concern that smaller businesses could be adversely affected by compliance costs for a complicated regulatory environment, he said he would vote to approve the bill, as its merits are greater than its risks, according to media reports.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) opposed the bill, saying public notice would not adequately curb facial recognition use, and that authorities could sidestep limits on governments agency use in the bill by invoking emergency powers. Instead, the ACLU proposed its own legislation to restrict facial recognition technology from use by state and local governments until or unless several conditions could be met.

The data protection bill was supported by Microsoft, and Amazon suggested certain minor adjustments, but it was opposed by police body camera-maker Axon.

A key difference between the new law and Illinois’ BIPA and some other proposed legislation is an absence of the right of individual action. Penalties under the bill range from $2,500 to $7,500 per violation, but would be enforced only by the state attorney general.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events