FB pixel

Appellate court rules biometrics collection alone establishes harm as Washington considers following BIPA

Appellate court rules biometrics collection alone establishes harm as Washington considers following BIPA
 

The Illinois State Supreme Court’s ruling that harm is established under the regulation by procedural violations in the use of biometric systems applies even if the collected biometrics are not stored or used, the state’s First District Appellate Court has ruled, the National Law Review reports. The Appellate Court rejected an attempt by the defendant in a BIPA suit to limit the scope of the State Supreme Court’s ruling in Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, which would have forced the plaintiff to establish some other legal standing for the suit.

The Rosenbach ruling leaves the viability of some defenses unclear, according to the National Law Review, but the ruling in Rottner v. Palm Beach Tan, Inc. provides the first indication of how appellate courts will interpret the Rosenbach decision.

Another BIPA suit claiming a procedural violation has been filed against Trilogy Warehouse Partners II LLC and Doe Defendants 1-10 by employee Isaac Brown, the Madison Record reports.

The Warehouse allegedly used a fingerprint time and attendance system without providing the required notice or obtaining consent, according to the plaintiff.

Hundreds of suits have been filed under BIPA, many or most relating to procedural violations and employee time and attendance tracking systems. Legislation amending the law to remove the right of private action is currently in committee in the State Senate.

The next front for biometric legal suits

The Washington Privacy Act (WPA) is set to become the second major privacy legislation in the U.S. following recent development in both houses of the state legislature, according to a blog post by law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP. The WPA includes some similar provisions to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which was passed in June, but in some ways goes further, the post says.

Washington State Senators passed the proposed bill by a 46-1 vote in early March, and a similar bill is poised to likewise breeze through the House. The few major differences between the versions in the two legislative chambers include a right of private action in the House version, though with a 30-day right to cure and without a right to seek legal costs. The Senate version also restricts applicability to businesses with data belonging to a certain number of people, or deriving more than half its gross revenue from personal data sales, while the House version would apply to all businesses in Washington or targeting Washington residents.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Groups reject expiry date for digital ID cards in Kenya as govt defends move

Some civil society organizations in Kenya say they want an explanation from the government with regard to the institution of…

 

Idemia forensic software extracts human faces, tattoos for investigative leads

Even when a facial recognition system is integrated within a state or federal investigative agency, human intervention is necessary. In…

 

Nearly three quarters of U.S. adults worry deepfakes could sway election: Jumio

The hour is ripe for political deepfakes. The U.S. presidential elections are still four months away, and the campaign has…

 

Controversial US privacy bill rewritten again, but path still unclear

The already controversial American Privacy Rights Act of 2024 (APRA), which was originally introduced in April by U.S. Senate Commerce…

 

Selective disclosure and zero-knowledge proofs: Examining the latest revision of ETSI TR 119 476

By Sebastian Elfors, Senior Architect at IDnow In July 2024, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) published an updated revision of…

 

Contractor needed for project to identify civil registration hurdles in Chad

A request for the Expression of Interest (EOI) has been launched for a consultancy firm to identify challenges that stand…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events