FB pixel

Biometrics researchers play too fast and loose with flashy findings — study

Categories Biometric R&D  |  Biometrics News  |  Surveillance
 

biometric identification facial recognition

As a rule, the more huffery in coverage of exciting biometric research, the more puffery will be found when really analyzing the research.

Case in point: A team of researchers found unabashedly credulous coverage in popular media of almost any lab work involving adversarial machine-learning attacks against biometric surveillance systems.

The researchers focused on developments promising invisibility cloaks and masks that might hide people from computer vision systems feeding data to facial recognition algorithms. Their work was posted in the preprint Arxiv repository.

Regardless of how many qualifiers are used in research papers, too many in the media think only of how high the news will climb in search engine results.

And the only thing rarer in research than an adequately funded study is an organization demanding corrections to articles that make its scientists look more like geniuses than they may be.

While much of the blame falls on consumer-interest editors, the researchers investigating this symbiotic relationship say organizations are playing cute with less-than-challenging investigatory processes.

In fact, according to the new paper, they are not publishing based on “actual (sic) real world testing.”

They are not conducting extensive human subjects research, according to the team boasting researchers from Microsoft, software developer Citizen Lab, Harvard University and Swarthmore College.

They wrote: “We found the physical or real-world testing conducted was minimal, provided few details about testing subjects and was often conducted as an afterthought or demonstration.” Performance and reliability outside the laboratory are inadequately tested.

For good measure, they said future research in facial recognition and other surveillance research should find subjects from the populations most often targeted by the biometric surveillance systems: people of color, those other than cisgendered individuals, and sex workers.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

White House fraud crackdown sharpens focus on digital identity

The Trump administration’s March 6 Executive Order 14390, aimed at combating cybercrime and fraud, has prompted a significant response from…

 

Gender gaps threaten progress on global legal identity goals, Vital Strategies CEO warns

As countries work toward universal legal identity under SDG 16.9, greater focus on gender inclusion is needed to ensure women and…

 

Guyana data chief says digital ID won’t replace voter ID

Guyana’s Data Protection Commissioner, Aneal Giddings, has clarified that the country’s national digital ID is not intended to be used…

 

Biometrics at scale: EES setbacks meet growth push

The effectiveness of biometrics deployments at scale can be prone to failures of procedure or coordination, as travelers to Europe…

 

Concordium’s Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki wants to keep your AI agents in line

“Without identity, autonomous action is just autonomous risk.” So says Boris Bohrer-Bilowitzki, CEO of Layer-1 blockchain protocol Concordium. Concordium has…

 

Veratad among first certified to ISO 27566 age assurance standard

Veratad is one of the first companies worldwide to achieve certification to ISO/IEC 27566‑1:2025, the newly established international standard for…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events