FB pixel

Clearview says biometric privacy injunction unconstitutional, could force its closure



Clearview AI says in a motion filed to oppose a plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief in its biometric data privacy suit that it may be forced to suspend its operations across the U.S.

The company argues that plaintiffs failed to prove any of the elements necessary for an injunction, after the company “voluntarily changed its business practices over the past year.”

The plaintiffs’ filing acknowledges that injunctive relief orders have never been issued under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). They further alleged the company shows its practices had not meaningfully changed with its opt-out process, which requires users to first opt-in to biometric processing, and a patent depicting a commercial application.

Clearview claims that it is exempt from BIPA as a government subcontractor, though the status of subcontractors has likewise never been ruled on in court. Additionally, holding Clearview to BIPA would violate extraterritoriality law in Illinois and the U.S. Constitution’s dormant Commerce Clause (regulating interstate business relations) and its First Amendment (which protects freedom of expression). If any of these arguments are accepted by the court, it would undermine the plaintiffs’ claim that any violation of BIPA occurred, Clearview says.

As a facial recognition provider only to government agencies, with no practice of selling biometric information, redistributing it or otherwise profiting from it, plaintiffs have also not shown that any harm would occur without the injunction, the company argues.

Biometric data collection was ruled to constitute a harm to individuals’ property interests over three years ago.

For Clearview, however, an injunction could force it to cease operations, “depending on the relief fashioned,” which the company argues would also harm public interest.

This is because Clearview does not associate the images it scrapes for its facial recognition database with an identity, and therefore cannot determine if individuals are Illinois residents, and therefore it is likely it would have to stop using its entire database.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News


The UK’s election may spell out the future of its national ID cards

Identity cards are back among the UK’s top controversial topics – thanks to the upcoming elections and its focus on…


Challenges in face biometrics addressed with new tech and research amid high stakes

Big biometrics contracts and deals were the theme of several of the stories on that drew the most interest from…


Online age verification debates continue in Canada, EU, India

Introducing age verification to protect children online remains a hot topic across the globe: Canada is debating the Online Harms…


Login.gov adds selfie biometrics for May pilot

America’s single-sign on system for government benefits and services, Login.gov, is getting a face biometrics option for enhanced identity verification…


BIPA one step closer to seeing its first major change since 2008 inception

On Thursday, a bipartisan majority in the Illinois Senate approved the first major change to Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act…


Identity verification industry mulls solutions to flood of synthetic IDs

The advent of AI-powered generators such as OnlyFake, which creates realistic-looking photos of fake IDs for only US$15, has stirred…


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read From This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events