FB pixel

Simplified Arrival face biometrics reaches 5 new ports, faces questions

Simplified Arrival face biometrics reaches 5 new ports, faces questions
 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), meanwhile, has launched its Simplified Arrival face biometrics to a pair of pedestrian border crossings in Vermont and three in Maine to automate the document checks required for entry into the country.

The biometric facial comparison technology has been deployed to Highgate Springs and Derby Line, Vermont, and Houlton, Jackman and Calais, Maine.

The process takes only a few seconds and has accuracy above 98 percent, according to the announcements.

CBP is up to 113 million travelers processed with face biometrics at land, air and seaports of entry, and has prevented the entry of more than 1,050 imposters into the United States.

In a recent Senate Homeland Security meeting, Senator James Lankford (R-OK) inquired about the progress of CBP towards deployment of Simplified Arrival across its operations, and the program’s effectiveness at catching imposters.

CBP Office of Field Operations Deputy Executive Assistant Commissioner Diane Sabatino testified that out of 950 incidents of document fraud by imposters had been identified through face biometrics at the U.S. border, 600 of them along the Southwest border. Just over 500 incidents across the country were accepted for prosecution.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), however, is unimpressed. The group is calling for CBP to reverse course on its intention to collect information from migrants before they arrive, including photos for use with facial recognition in comments on the proposal.

The photos are placed in CBP’s Automated Targeting System (ATS) for vetting against the Traveler Verification Service (TVS).

The automated process and biometric storage, EPIC says, exposes migrants to risks of racial bias, data breaches and law enforcement abuse. The group argues that CBP should set limits on the use of images collected, and should provide sufficient justification for continuing the practice.

This post was updated at 10:55am Eastern on December 2, 2021 to correct Diane Sabatino’s first name.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events