FB pixel

Restrictions on police use of facial recognition proposed in US Congress

Restrictions on police use of facial recognition proposed in US Congress
 

There is more legislative action in the U.S. on facial recognition technology, as four members of Congress yesterday introduced the Facial Recognition Act, which would require police to obtain a warrant and have probable cause to investigate a suspect before conducting face biometric searches.

“Protecting the privacy of Americans – especially against a flawed, unregulated, and at times discriminatory technology – is my chief goal with this legislation,” said Congressman Ted Lieu (D-CA), who joined Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), Congresswoman Yvette Clarke (D-NY), and Congressman Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) in bringing forth the Facial Recognition Act.

According to a supporting statement from the Electronic Privacy Information Centre (EPIC), the legislation would also prohibit the use of face biometrics in the enforcement of immigration laws, on police body cameras, during protests, and on live video feeds. Furthermore, it would introduce transparency and reliability requirements, to be monitored via public audits, accuracy reviews and other measures. And, adds TechCrunch, it would make it mandatory for law enforcement agencies to purge photo databases of kids who never faced charges, or were acquitted.

“There is no question that, in its current state, facial recognition is a flawed and harmful technology,” said Congresswoman Clark, in a statement posted online. “We have long passed the theoretical when it comes to its struggles identifying and misidentifying women and people of color and, consequently, the real-world implications of its deficiencies are confronting real people every day. While these shortcomings are disastrous in the private sector, in law enforcement, they are entirely unacceptable.”

Facial recognition continues to cause waves around the globe, with recent instances in Australia, China, the UK and Norway of pushback against what some call a tool for repressive surveillance.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events