FB pixel

UK High Court rejects delisting Synesis without considering corporate changes

Categories Biometrics News  |  Surveillance  |  Trade Notes
UK High Court rejects delisting Synesis without considering corporate changes
 

The first challenge to sanctions by the United Kingdom on Russia-related grounds has failed.

A report paid for by the Belarusian facial recognition surveillance firm Synesis to support its being dropped from a sanctions list reportedly was ignored by the UK’s High Court.

Instead, according to multiple reports, the court relied on a ministerial review of the sanctions, which found no reason to delist Synesis.

Belarus is governed by a strong-man government that is allied closely with Russia, which is prosecuting an invasion and takeover of neighboring Ukraine. A former part-owner of Synesis, Alexei Aleksin, is reported to be a supporter of the Belarus government. It is alleged that Aleksin left the company after it was listed by the UK government.

A former Synesis subsidiary, 24×7 Panoptes, had sold its biometric surveillance software, Kipod, to the government of President Alexander Lukashenko. Kipod was a central component of what the government called the Republican System for Monitoring Public Security.

Allegedly, it was used to repress opposition to Lukashenko. Large-business and high-wealth-individual law firm Macfarlanes, in a posted analysis of the situation, says the government was capable of “hunting” for a person based on an image.

A year ago, according to Synesis, Lukashenko replaced Panoptes as the “technical operator of the system” with a state-owned business, Beltelecom RUE. The change was complete around the time the UK decided to sanction Synesis.

Synesis claims that Beltelecom implemented another surveillance system and that Panoptes was not involved in any way since that decision.

It is not clear outside of the government if Beltelecom has created its own software or if it is operating Kipod.

Synesis executives reportedly have admitted Kipod could be used to find and follow individuals but have said it was not used to do so. At the same time, according to another law firm, BCL Solicitors, Synesis executives have said that aside from receiving monthly subscription payments, they had no interaction with the firm.

It is unknown at this time if Synesis has further options to appeal being listed.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Report demystifies India’s unique face biometrics market beyond the benchmarks

Biometric authentication is taking off in India as the country’s government and market align around identity as a trust layer…

 

Trust inevitable in building human rights-sensitive digital ID systems

Some digital rights advocates who spoke at the recent ID4Africa 2026 AGM in Abidjan emphasized that for African governments to…

 

Nepalese raise concerns over new DPI loans amid previous project failures

Some experts have expressed apprehensions that the government of Nepal has contracted a new loan for the implementation of a…

 

GripID introduces ultra-compact multimodal biometric enrollment kit

France-based GripID has unveiled the compact V10 multimodal biometric enrollment kit for registration to national ID and civil digital identity…

 

Australia opens feedback on verifiable credential policy, trust framework proposals

Australia’s Department of Finance is inviting community feedback on a policy for using verifiable credentials proposed by the Commonwealth. The…

 

FBI warning on Kali365 phishing kit exposes limits of weaker authentication

A new Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) warning about a phishing-as-a-service kit targeting Microsoft 365 accounts is underscoring why major…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events