FB pixel

UK High Court rejects delisting Synesis without considering corporate changes

Categories Biometrics News  |  Surveillance  |  Trade Notes
UK High Court rejects delisting Synesis without considering corporate changes
 

The first challenge to sanctions by the United Kingdom on Russia-related grounds has failed.

A report paid for by the Belarusian facial recognition surveillance firm Synesis to support its being dropped from a sanctions list reportedly was ignored by the UK’s High Court.

Instead, according to multiple reports, the court relied on a ministerial review of the sanctions, which found no reason to delist Synesis.

Belarus is governed by a strong-man government that is allied closely with Russia, which is prosecuting an invasion and takeover of neighboring Ukraine. A former part-owner of Synesis, Alexei Aleksin, is reported to be a supporter of the Belarus government. It is alleged that Aleksin left the company after it was listed by the UK government.

A former Synesis subsidiary, 24×7 Panoptes, had sold its biometric surveillance software, Kipod, to the government of President Alexander Lukashenko. Kipod was a central component of what the government called the Republican System for Monitoring Public Security.

Allegedly, it was used to repress opposition to Lukashenko. Large-business and high-wealth-individual law firm Macfarlanes, in a posted analysis of the situation, says the government was capable of “hunting” for a person based on an image.

A year ago, according to Synesis, Lukashenko replaced Panoptes as the “technical operator of the system” with a state-owned business, Beltelecom RUE. The change was complete around the time the UK decided to sanction Synesis.

Synesis claims that Beltelecom implemented another surveillance system and that Panoptes was not involved in any way since that decision.

It is not clear outside of the government if Beltelecom has created its own software or if it is operating Kipod.

Synesis executives reportedly have admitted Kipod could be used to find and follow individuals but have said it was not used to do so. At the same time, according to another law firm, BCL Solicitors, Synesis executives have said that aside from receiving monthly subscription payments, they had no interaction with the firm.

It is unknown at this time if Synesis has further options to appeal being listed.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Au10tix gets nod from Microsoft as ideal solution for AI agents built in MS Copilot

At the recent Microsoft Build event, Au10tix got a public endorsement from Microsoft as an ideal match for AI agents…

 

UK inches towards digital ID clarity with passage of Data (Use and Access) Bill

The UK House of Lords has passed the government’s Data (Use and Access) Bill, bringing it within a royal signature…

 

Age assurance trial on track amid sweeping online regulatory changes in Australia

Australia’s Age Assurance Technology Trial is going well, thank you very much. That’s the gist of a post from the…

 

Airport biometric screening expands across US amid calls for federal oversight

Biometrics is steaming ahead for air travel, but privacy concerns remain while consumers are still becoming aware of modern changes….

 

DHS, private sector pushes wireless biometric sensing capabilities forward

Two distinct advances in non-invasive biometric surveillance are now converging to form a powerful trend that is redefining the landscape…

 

Zambia says using multiple strategies to meet 50 percent birth registration goal by 2026

Zambia is currently at a point of transition where it is moving from extremely limited birth registration to universal registration…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events