FB pixel

No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped

Categories Biometrics News  |  Trade Notes
No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped
 

A lawsuit alleging biometric data privacy violations by FaceTec has been formally dismissed without a hearing, after plaintiffs’ counsel discovered that the requirements for collecting informed consent from data subjects do not apply to the facial authentication provider.

The allegations under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act apply to entities storing and using people’s biometrics. In contrast to facial authentication providers who provide their biometrics checks as a cloud service running on third-party servers, FaceTec’s software runs on its customers’ servers, behind their firewalls. That means that while FaceTec’s clients must obtain informed consent from end-users, FaceTec is immune.

The legal machinations to drop the case began in January, after the company filed a motion explaining how its 3D face biometrics software works.

“FaceTec has created the most privacy-conscious identity verification architecture on the market because FaceTec software is designed so customer’s collect and process PII from their own end-users,” explains Terry Coffing, FaceTec’s chief legal officer. “Plaintiff’s counsel, McGuire Law, PC, reviewed that architecture and voluntarily dismissed the case consistent with their ethical obligations and the facts. This decision shows that in a patchwork of increasingly difficult-to-navigate biometric privacy frameworks, straightforward, two-party, privacy-focused biometric architectures are a win for both the end-users and organizations.”

McGuire Law is one of America’s most prominent class-action plaintiffs’ firms, and its change of direction for voluntary dismissal is rare, according to a company announcement.

FaceTec says in the announcement that its privacy-by-design architecture avoids any need for personally identifiable information (PII) and biometric data to be transmitted to third-party servers in the U.S. or overseas, which can expose KYC providers and relying parties to additional obligations under BIPA.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

ICE using data and probability to decide where to detain and arrest people

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Enhanced Leads Identification & Targeting for Enforcement (ELITE) tool is being used to identify “targets”…

 

In AI era, identity is about governance, Microblink’s Hartley Thompson tells BU Podcast

“One of the defining things in my life is change,” says Hartley Thompson of Microblink. “How do you react to…

 

CLR Labs wins funding to support biometrics, IAD, digital wallet standardization

Cabinet Louis Reynaud (CLR Labs) has won funding from a French government program to support its standardization efforts in biometrics,…

 

Checkr crossed $800M gross in 2025 as biometric background checks expand

Biometric background check provider Checkr is celebrating 2025 as its most successful year ever, with gross revenue surpassing $800 million…

 

Identity and risk infrastructure startup secures $12M for Europe, LATAM expansion

Monnai, which provides identity and risk data infrastructure, has announced a 12 million dollar equity funding round led by Motive…

 

Hopae appoints Sarah Clark to lead US expansion of digital ID verification platform

Sarah Clark is Hopae’s new CPO and GM for North America, joining the Seoul-headquartered company to help extend the reach…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events