FB pixel

No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped

Categories Biometrics News  |  Trade Notes
No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped
 

A lawsuit alleging biometric data privacy violations by FaceTec has been formally dismissed without a hearing, after plaintiffs’ counsel discovered that the requirements for collecting informed consent from data subjects do not apply to the facial authentication provider.

The allegations under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act apply to entities storing and using people’s biometrics. In contrast to facial authentication providers who provide their biometrics checks as a cloud service running on third-party servers, FaceTec’s software runs on its customers’ servers, behind their firewalls. That means that while FaceTec’s clients must obtain informed consent from end-users, FaceTec is immune.

The legal machinations to drop the case began in January, after the company filed a motion explaining how its 3D face biometrics software works.

“FaceTec has created the most privacy-conscious identity verification architecture on the market because FaceTec software is designed so customer’s collect and process PII from their own end-users,” explains Terry Coffing, FaceTec’s chief legal officer. “Plaintiff’s counsel, McGuire Law, PC, reviewed that architecture and voluntarily dismissed the case consistent with their ethical obligations and the facts. This decision shows that in a patchwork of increasingly difficult-to-navigate biometric privacy frameworks, straightforward, two-party, privacy-focused biometric architectures are a win for both the end-users and organizations.”

McGuire Law is one of America’s most prominent class-action plaintiffs’ firms, and its change of direction for voluntary dismissal is rare, according to a company announcement.

FaceTec says in the announcement that its privacy-by-design architecture avoids any need for personally identifiable information (PII) and biometric data to be transmitted to third-party servers in the U.S. or overseas, which can expose KYC providers and relying parties to additional obligations under BIPA.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

iProov biometrics and liveness detection to secure workforce IDs on Microsoft Entra

Enterprise workers using Microsoft Entra ID can now use iProov biometrics and liveness detection to log into company systems through…

 

Malaysia’s prime minister loses it with MyDigital ID’s slow progress

Malaysia’s leader has voiced deep frustration with the slow progress in two key national digital initiatives. This week it was…

 

IDVerse acquired by LexisNexis to boost biometric fraud protection

LexisNexis Risk Solutions has struck a deal to acquire IDVerse adding biometric fraud protection to its portfolio of analytics and…

 

Intellicheck to provide identity validation for Accio Data

Intellicheck, Inc. has announced an integration with Accio Data to streamline background screening checks for job applicants. A release from…

 

UK digital age assurance receives support from stakeholders: Reports

UK’s attempts to legalize digital age assurance technology are likely to be successful, according to media reports. In January, the…

 

Ghana unveils biometric border management system, e-gates at main airport

Ghana has upgraded its border management capabilities with the introduction of a biometric-based system to facilitate immigration controls. The launch…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events