FB pixel

No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped

Categories Biometrics News  |  Trade Notes
No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped
 

A lawsuit alleging biometric data privacy violations by FaceTec has been formally dismissed without a hearing, after plaintiffs’ counsel discovered that the requirements for collecting informed consent from data subjects do not apply to the facial authentication provider.

The allegations under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act apply to entities storing and using people’s biometrics. In contrast to facial authentication providers who provide their biometrics checks as a cloud service running on third-party servers, FaceTec’s software runs on its customers’ servers, behind their firewalls. That means that while FaceTec’s clients must obtain informed consent from end-users, FaceTec is immune.

The legal machinations to drop the case began in January, after the company filed a motion explaining how its 3D face biometrics software works.

“FaceTec has created the most privacy-conscious identity verification architecture on the market because FaceTec software is designed so customer’s collect and process PII from their own end-users,” explains Terry Coffing, FaceTec’s chief legal officer. “Plaintiff’s counsel, McGuire Law, PC, reviewed that architecture and voluntarily dismissed the case consistent with their ethical obligations and the facts. This decision shows that in a patchwork of increasingly difficult-to-navigate biometric privacy frameworks, straightforward, two-party, privacy-focused biometric architectures are a win for both the end-users and organizations.”

McGuire Law is one of America’s most prominent class-action plaintiffs’ firms, and its change of direction for voluntary dismissal is rare, according to a company announcement.

FaceTec says in the announcement that its privacy-by-design architecture avoids any need for personally identifiable information (PII) and biometric data to be transmitted to third-party servers in the U.S. or overseas, which can expose KYC providers and relying parties to additional obligations under BIPA.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Border biometrics move toward better gates, or none at all

The biometric technology needed for a new kind of border control is here. Travelers can already move through airports and…

 

ICE voter data, nonprofit investigations expose expansive surveillance machinery

Newly released records show U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) amassed tens of millions of voter records and investigated more…

 

ICE scraps visa vetting system recompete in favor of Palantir Foundry

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has canceled a planned competitive procurement for continued support of its Visa Security Program…

 

TECH5 names Rahul Parthe CEO for next phase of digital infrastructure growth

Tech5 is putting co-founder Rahul Parthe in charge of operations as it seeks to bring its national digital infrastructure model…

 

Next Biometrics to file for bankruptcy

Next Biometrics has run out of time to fund its pivot around its new Anywhere-in-Display fingerprint biometrics technology, announcing its…

 

Ethiopia launches developer sandbox to support Fayda digital ID innovation, integration

Ethiopia’s National ID Program (NIDP), re-established in August as Faydaverse Digital Solutions, has launched a public sandbox environment for the…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Biometric Update Podcast

Featured Company

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events