FB pixel

No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped

Categories Biometrics News  |  Trade Notes
No hearing necessary as biometric data privacy lawsuit against FaceTec dropped
 

A lawsuit alleging biometric data privacy violations by FaceTec has been formally dismissed without a hearing, after plaintiffs’ counsel discovered that the requirements for collecting informed consent from data subjects do not apply to the facial authentication provider.

The allegations under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act apply to entities storing and using people’s biometrics. In contrast to facial authentication providers who provide their biometrics checks as a cloud service running on third-party servers, FaceTec’s software runs on its customers’ servers, behind their firewalls. That means that while FaceTec’s clients must obtain informed consent from end-users, FaceTec is immune.

The legal machinations to drop the case began in January, after the company filed a motion explaining how its 3D face biometrics software works.

“FaceTec has created the most privacy-conscious identity verification architecture on the market because FaceTec software is designed so customer’s collect and process PII from their own end-users,” explains Terry Coffing, FaceTec’s chief legal officer. “Plaintiff’s counsel, McGuire Law, PC, reviewed that architecture and voluntarily dismissed the case consistent with their ethical obligations and the facts. This decision shows that in a patchwork of increasingly difficult-to-navigate biometric privacy frameworks, straightforward, two-party, privacy-focused biometric architectures are a win for both the end-users and organizations.”

McGuire Law is one of America’s most prominent class-action plaintiffs’ firms, and its change of direction for voluntary dismissal is rare, according to a company announcement.

FaceTec says in the announcement that its privacy-by-design architecture avoids any need for personally identifiable information (PII) and biometric data to be transmitted to third-party servers in the U.S. or overseas, which can expose KYC providers and relying parties to additional obligations under BIPA.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Certification becoming trust signal for procurement and market positioning

One consequence of the explosion of synthetic media and AI-generated identities is that trusted identity infrastructure has become strategically valuable…

 

IAD testing set to take off as QTSP deadline passes, EUDI Wallet onboarding begins

Independent assessments of biometric injection attack detection (IAD) are about to become significantly more prominent, with the deadline for Qualified…

 

UK’s proposed OS-level age verification could eliminate part of DVS market

The UK government is mooting device-level restrictions on nude images that could usher in a new era of a kid-friendly…

 

UK promises age assurance for social media, device-level child safety controls

How many times can a head of government pledge to do something about harmful social media platforms before they’re obligated…

 

Aware upgrades biometric orchestration platform with ROC, Mitek integrations

Aware has added ROC and Mitek as biometric technology partners for its digital identity orchestration platform, Awareness, as part of…

 

Appeals board upholds 4 FaceTec biometric liveness detection patents

The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has ruled in a fight over intellectual property for biometric liveness detection between…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events