FB pixel

Oversight body lists risks for the US’ mired Login.gov project

Oversight body lists risks for the US’ mired Login.gov project
 

The U.S. government’s Login.gov program continues to provide lessons to review for future public administration, public policy and digital identity students.

Officials from a Department Treasury’s inspector general’s office, a watchdog agency, last month published a significantly redacted 20-page memo (largely a timeline) recounting the Internal Revenue Service sign-on travails.

The memo is one of the more unflattering portraits of government, generally, and digital ID and access management by government, specifically. It very much is worth the time to read. Trade publication Nextgov/FCW has a good summary of the timeline and results.

The single sign-on program Login.gov has proved problematic in Washington. At the same time, the program is entangled with the federal government’s unpopular, tentative and sometimes chaotic efforts to add facial recognition as an anti-fraud tool.

Inspector general staff reviewed events and communications occurring between June 2019 and last July and circled three unresolved security risk, only two of which have been made public.

Login.gov is not yet in compliance with Identity Assurance Level 2, devised by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

IAL2 is met when a process can use evidence to support someone’s claimed identity and verifies an applicant remotely (with biometrics) or physically. And attributes can be asserted by a credential service provider to relying parties.

Another risk hangs on Login.gov’s not fully implanting specific controls. These controls would improve the program’s anti-fraud functions, which are mandated by the Office of Management and Budget.

The third risk is largely redacted, but still bodes no good. There are potentially fraudulent activities by an unknown actor that should be investigated.

The response by the Treasury Department, a brief memo from the deputy commissioner for operations support says nothing more than officials appreciate the inspector general’s efforts and that protecting taxpayer data is a top priority.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

IDV spending to hit $29B by 2030 as DPI projects scale: Juniper Research

Spending on digital identity verification (IDV) technology is projected to reach a 55 percent growth rate between now and 2030,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events