FB pixel

Oversight body lists risks for the US’ mired Login.gov project

Oversight body lists risks for the US’ mired Login.gov project
 

The U.S. government’s Login.gov program continues to provide lessons to review for future public administration, public policy and digital identity students.

Officials from a Department Treasury’s inspector general’s office, a watchdog agency, last month published a significantly redacted 20-page memo (largely a timeline) recounting the Internal Revenue Service sign-on travails.

The memo is one of the more unflattering portraits of government, generally, and digital ID and access management by government, specifically. It very much is worth the time to read. Trade publication Nextgov/FCW has a good summary of the timeline and results.

The single sign-on program Login.gov has proved problematic in Washington. At the same time, the program is entangled with the federal government’s unpopular, tentative and sometimes chaotic efforts to add facial recognition as an anti-fraud tool.

Inspector general staff reviewed events and communications occurring between June 2019 and last July and circled three unresolved security risk, only two of which have been made public.

Login.gov is not yet in compliance with Identity Assurance Level 2, devised by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

IAL2 is met when a process can use evidence to support someone’s claimed identity and verifies an applicant remotely (with biometrics) or physically. And attributes can be asserted by a credential service provider to relying parties.

Another risk hangs on Login.gov’s not fully implanting specific controls. These controls would improve the program’s anti-fraud functions, which are mandated by the Office of Management and Budget.

The third risk is largely redacted, but still bodes no good. There are potentially fraudulent activities by an unknown actor that should be investigated.

The response by the Treasury Department, a brief memo from the deputy commissioner for operations support says nothing more than officials appreciate the inspector general’s efforts and that protecting taxpayer data is a top priority.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics regulations, misconceptions threaten to undermine EUDI Wallets

Is it a case of shoot first and ask questions later? Asking for a biometrics provider. Maybe it’s due caution…

 

ID4Africa vendors see Africa leapfrogging legacy digital identity systems

The annual ID4Africa AGM is a major world event in identity – a must-attend for many biometrics providers working on…

 

Gataca boosts age assurance pitch with certification to ISO standard by ACCS

Madrid-based Gataca is now certified as a provider of privacy-preserving age assurance following an independent assessment. The company successfully completed…

 

BixeLab testing activity highlights expansion of biometric assurance

As digital identity systems evolve, biometric testing labs are increasingly becoming central to trust, compliance and interoperability. BixeLab’s recent activity…

 

Apple removes Russian digital ID app Max from its stores citing sanctions

Apple has removed Russian state-backed messaging and digital ID platform Max from its official App Store, affecting more than 20…

 

G7 backs privacy-preserving age assurance as Japan proposes social media access limits

Japan is considering new restrictions on minors’ access to social media while stopping short of blanket age bans. While countries…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events