FB pixel

Single sign-on for US government services getting face biometrics

Single sign-on for US government services getting face biometrics
 

Login.gov, the U.S. government’s single sign-on service, is at long last getting a face biometrics function. Probably.

Officials with the General Services Administration, which owns Login.gov, have said they will add two ID verification functions to Login.gov. One will be face-matching, a controversial option for a vocal segment of privacy-prizing citizens.

Another verification option, one that does not involve facial recognition algorithms, is in the works, according to the government, but the GSA hasn’t announced it. The agency has suggested video calls connecting taxpayers and “a trained identity verification professional.”

The government had already announced a third option, which will enable people to confirm their identity by visiting a post office.

If the U.S. Postal Service is one of the most trusted federal government bureaucracies (and it is), the Internal Revenue Service is decidedly not. That is relevant here because of the drubbing IRS officials got last year over messaging about biometric verification.

In January 2022, the tax agency put out word that people could create online agency accounts via authentication services provided by ID.me, which sells the services broadly. Some taxpayers were enraged thinking, erroneously, that people had to register their faces with the government to pay their taxes.

The use of facial recognition at the IRS was pared back significantly in the aftermath of the controversy. For a short time, it looked like IRS officials were going to tie up to Login.gov, but they appear to have had second thoughts.

And it’s not as if GSA hasn’t made its share of problems for itself with Login.gov. There are accusations that GSA allegedly staff made “misrepresentations” about the security of the single sign-on service in order to bill for related services.

According to an inspector general, Login.gov officials allegedly led federal agencies to believe that the service met the Identity Assurance Level 2 standard. It did not, for a lack of biometrics, until now.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

RIVR results show biometric liveness detection effectiveness highly variable

The state of the art in biometric presentation attack detection (PAD) is better than document validation, but far worse than…

 

Court signals NetChoice faces tougher road on age check laws

The legal campaign against state social media age check laws is entering a more precarious phase for NetChoice and the…

 

Spain’s AEPD fines Yoti $1.1M for biometric data handling violations

Yoti has been fined 950,000 euros (roughly US$1.1 million) by Spanish data protection regulator AEPD for the handling of biometrics…

 

UK gov’t to design and build national digital ID in-house

The UK government plans to design, build and run its digital ID in-house, rather than outsourcing it to a private-sector…

 

UK Lords reject bid to block police facial recognition searches of DVLA database

The UK’s House of Lords has voted down an attempt to prevent the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) database…

 

India is leading example of digital infrastructure, IMF says

Digital public infrastructure (DPI) is being recognized as a foundational public good and a new paper from the International Monetary…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events