FB pixel

AI innovates in forensic biometrics; finds same patterns on different fingerprints

AI innovates in forensic biometrics; finds same patterns on different fingerprints
 

An AI algorithm looked at multitudes of fingerprints in an uncommon way and reportedly learned that they are not as unique as they are assumed to be.

There’s a big but non-fatal caveat. Duplicate and near-duplicate print patterns occur on multiple fingers of an individual’s hand, which makes them matchable.

(For the time being, everyone has unique prints compared to others.)

Columbia University engineering researchers, at least some of whom had no experience in forensic biometrics, decided to use a deep contrastive network to see if all fingerprints are, indeed, unique. The research was led by an undergraduate who began the work as a first-year student.

They initially pointed the code at a NIST database of 60,000 fingerprints for intra-hand matching.

The algorithm’s accuracy for one pair of prints reached 77 percent, according to the team. With multiple prints, it peaked at 88 percent. That’s not a record that would convince a competent lawyer to use the technique in court, but as the university says of the work, it could lead investigators to prioritize leads to reach perhaps surprising results. Further, training the system on millions of fingerprints could dramatically improve its accuracy.

A forensics journal described by the university as “well-established” rejected the researchers’ paper, on grounds that the uniqueness of every fingerprint is already established. It has now been accepted by the journal Science Advances.

The biometric algorithm’s apparent method (it’s not obvious how it worked) differed from a hundred years of standard operating procedures. It paid attention to the curves and angles of swirls at the center of the print, known as “the singularity,” rather than the branching and end points of print ridges, or minutiae, used to date.

The results were similar across subjects of different races and genders. Next steps include analyzing data from a more diverse sample of people.

This post was updated at 3:18pm Eastern on January 12, 2024 to clarify the nature of the similarities found.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Certainty vs flexibility – does the UK need a Biometric Surveillance Act?

By Professor Fraser Sampson, former UK Biometrics & Surveillance Camera Commissioner Last week London became a city of two tales. Two…

 

TestMu AI releases testing tool for agent-produced code

TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest) has launched Kane CLI, “a new browser automation tool that runs directly from the terminal,” and…

 

Travel biometrics making new connections

Airport biometrics projects and companies are breaking new ground and intersecting with other industry trends, from digital wallets to biometric…

 

Biometric Update Podcast: Teresa Wu on SIA’s Corporate Credential Design Guide

The Security Industry Association (SIA) has published its Corporate Credential Design Guide, and Idema Public Security’s Teresa Wu, who has…

 

AI agents operating continuously at machine speed are breaking human-centric IAM

New research commissioned by Ping Identity and compiled by KuppingerCole Analysts shows that “agents are being deployed into production faster…

 

Criticism follows inclusion of Madras Security Printers in Sri Lanka digital ID bids

Civil society group the People’s Struggle Alliance (PSA) has raised concerns regarding the inclusion of Madras Security Printers (MSP) in…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events