FB pixel

AI innovates in forensic biometrics; finds same patterns on different fingerprints

AI innovates in forensic biometrics; finds same patterns on different fingerprints
 

An AI algorithm looked at multitudes of fingerprints in an uncommon way and reportedly learned that they are not as unique as they are assumed to be.

There’s a big but non-fatal caveat. Duplicate and near-duplicate print patterns occur on multiple fingers of an individual’s hand, which makes them matchable.

(For the time being, everyone has unique prints compared to others.)

Columbia University engineering researchers, at least some of whom had no experience in forensic biometrics, decided to use a deep contrastive network to see if all fingerprints are, indeed, unique. The research was led by an undergraduate who began the work as a first-year student.

They initially pointed the code at a NIST database of 60,000 fingerprints for intra-hand matching.

The algorithm’s accuracy for one pair of prints reached 77 percent, according to the team. With multiple prints, it peaked at 88 percent. That’s not a record that would convince a competent lawyer to use the technique in court, but as the university says of the work, it could lead investigators to prioritize leads to reach perhaps surprising results. Further, training the system on millions of fingerprints could dramatically improve its accuracy.

A forensics journal described by the university as “well-established” rejected the researchers’ paper, on grounds that the uniqueness of every fingerprint is already established. It has now been accepted by the journal Science Advances.

The biometric algorithm’s apparent method (it’s not obvious how it worked) differed from a hundred years of standard operating procedures. It paid attention to the curves and angles of swirls at the center of the print, known as “the singularity,” rather than the branching and end points of print ridges, or minutiae, used to date.

The results were similar across subjects of different races and genders. Next steps include analyzing data from a more diverse sample of people.

This post was updated at 3:18pm Eastern on January 12, 2024 to clarify the nature of the similarities found.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Data is ammo in biometric authentication’s arms race with AI fraud: EIC 2025 panel

On the internet, nobody knows if your dog can skateboard. KuppingerCole Lead Analyst Paul Fisher introduced viral videos of skater…

 

Government faces questions about Gov.uk Wallet, asks its own questions about digital ID

Industry concern over the UK government’s plan to launch the Gov.uk Wallet continues to rise towards a boil, and meetings…

 

Scottish public support the use of biometrics in policing, Commissioner survey says

The latest survey of the Scottish public’s attitudes to police use of biometrics data has shown only “modest” improvement. The…

 

Hsiao-Chun Wu’s wearable biometric authentication via PPG wins NSF grant

A release from Louisiana State University (LSU)’s College of Engineering says electrical and computer engineering professor Hsiao-Chun Wu is the…

 

US biometric data privacy lawsuit against Clearview concludes after 5 years

The biometric data privacy lawsuit against Clearview AI has finally been officially settled. The lawsuit has been crawling along since…

 

UK govt pushes online safety regulations but commits major fumble on One Login

The online safety regulatory landscape in the UK is currently in the midst of a bizarre conflict, as the government…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events