FB pixel

AI innovates in forensic biometrics; finds same patterns on different fingerprints

AI innovates in forensic biometrics; finds same patterns on different fingerprints
 

An AI algorithm looked at multitudes of fingerprints in an uncommon way and reportedly learned that they are not as unique as they are assumed to be.

There’s a big but non-fatal caveat. Duplicate and near-duplicate print patterns occur on multiple fingers of an individual’s hand, which makes them matchable.

(For the time being, everyone has unique prints compared to others.)

Columbia University engineering researchers, at least some of whom had no experience in forensic biometrics, decided to use a deep contrastive network to see if all fingerprints are, indeed, unique. The research was led by an undergraduate who began the work as a first-year student.

They initially pointed the code at a NIST database of 60,000 fingerprints for intra-hand matching.

The algorithm’s accuracy for one pair of prints reached 77 percent, according to the team. With multiple prints, it peaked at 88 percent. That’s not a record that would convince a competent lawyer to use the technique in court, but as the university says of the work, it could lead investigators to prioritize leads to reach perhaps surprising results. Further, training the system on millions of fingerprints could dramatically improve its accuracy.

A forensics journal described by the university as “well-established” rejected the researchers’ paper, on grounds that the uniqueness of every fingerprint is already established. It has now been accepted by the journal Science Advances.

The biometric algorithm’s apparent method (it’s not obvious how it worked) differed from a hundred years of standard operating procedures. It paid attention to the curves and angles of swirls at the center of the print, known as “the singularity,” rather than the branching and end points of print ridges, or minutiae, used to date.

The results were similar across subjects of different races and genders. Next steps include analyzing data from a more diverse sample of people.

This post was updated at 3:18pm Eastern on January 12, 2024 to clarify the nature of the similarities found.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

NZ Parliamentary Committee recommends age assurance for social media

Age assurance should be required for people accessing social media in New Zealand to keep people under 16 away from…

 

EU kicks off panel discussions on social media age restrictions

The European Commission has taken another step towards regulating child safety online, organizing the first panel on age restrictions for…

 

EU can rein in AI agents with EUDI Wallets and business wallets: WE BUILD

The EU should take a coordinated approach to integrating AI agents into digital transactions, with special attention on payments, according…

 

Indonesia to ban under-16s from social media, implement standard-based age checks

Indonesia, the biggest country in Southeast Asia, is taking the momentous step to ban social media for under 16s. Communication…

 

GenKey takes over biometric passport, national ID card production in Comoros

East African archipelago nation Comoros has selected GenKey to produce its biometric passports and national ID cards. GenKey replaces Semlex,…

 

India mandates medical colleges to issue ABHA patient IDs in digital health push

India’s National Medical Commission (NMC) has directed that all medical colleges must generate and issue patient IDs to all those…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events