FB pixel

Meta scores biometric privacy lawsuit win over Facebook non-users

Instagram users step up to collect their share of BIPA settlement
Meta scores biometric privacy lawsuit win over Facebook non-users
 

A BIPA class action lawsuit against social media giant Meta has been quashed. The suit alleged that Meta Platforms Inc. collected the biometric information of Illinois residents who didn’t have Facebook accounts through its now-defunct Tag Suggestion feature, in violation of BIPA.

On Monday, a federal appeals court dismissed the lawsuit on semantic grounds. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that “face signatures” do not qualify as “biometric identifiers” under the statute’s definition. Face signatures are numerical sequences that represent a particular image of a face, created after software scans uploaded photos to detect faces.

The ruling agrees in principle with a lower district court’s summary judgment in favor of Meta, but disagrees on the legal grounds. According to the 20-page order (via Courthouse News), “the district court’s decision turned on the practical impossibility of Meta’s complying with BIPA if it had to obtain consent from everyone whose photo was uploaded to Facebook before it could employ Tag Suggestions. Because the plain text of BIPA applies to everyone whose biometric identifiers or information was held by Facebook, this conclusion was wrong.”

That said, the court went on to rule that face signatures are not biometric identifiers under BIPA. “Suided by BIPA’s statutory text, the panel concluded face signatures cannot identify and therefore are not biometric identifiers or information as defined by BIPA.”

Illinois’ biometric privacy law classifies a “biometric identifier” as “a retina or iris scan, fingerprint, voiceprint, or scan of hand or face geometry.” Per the law, biometric identifiers do not include photographs.

Meta faces loss, begins paying out for Instagram privacy violations

KXLH reports that Meta has started shelling out money to anyone in Illinois who used Instagram between Aug. 10, 2015 and Aug. 16, 2023, following the settlement of a class-action lawsuit alleging privacy law violations.

Anyone who used Instagram in Illinois was entitled to claim part of the $68.5 million settlement. But that 2016 business trip to Chicago you just remembered is no longer relevant: users had to submit a claim by September 27, 2023 to be included.

According to My Stateline, claimants have begun to receive settlement checks for $32.56.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

UK gov’t seeks covert surveillance tech in benefit fraud crackdown

The UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has published a £2 million (US$2.7 million) tender seeking software and hardware…

 

Biometrics in warfare, surveillance raise new oversight challenges

A new Congressional Research Service (CRS) report warns that biometric technologies are moving from routine identity verification into more consequential…

 

Harvard, Linux Foundation launch open-source wallet for selective data sharing

The internet is seeing a wide-scale push towards identity verification and age assurance, but the question remains: how can users…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events