FB pixel

NIST adds flexibility, digital format to security requirements for federal contractors

NIST adds flexibility, digital format to security requirements for federal contractors
 

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has updated its guidance for how businesses working with the federal government should protect sensitive data with biometrics and other digital technologies.

NIST issued the new “Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations” (NIST Special Publication 800-171, Revision 3), and companion document “Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information” (NIST SP 800-171A, Revision 3) based on its source catalog of security and privacy controls, as outlined in SP 800-53 and SP 800-53A, according to an announcement.

The controls laid out over the 120 pages of SP 800-171 address comprehensive security requirements for federal contractors, from access control to awareness and training, risk assessment to maintenance and incident response. Biometrics are not necessarily required, but are noted among possible technologies for use in identification and authentication, particularly for multi-factor authentication, in authenticator management and physical access control.

SP 800-171r3 updates the guidance for consistency with SP 800-53r5. It provides restructured security requirements to match the controls specified in SP 800-53r5, introduces organization-defined parameters (ODPs), streamlined criteria for tailoring, and recategorized controls based on those criteria. SP 800-171Ar3 adjusts the terminology for assessment procedures to line with the security and privacy controls and builds in ODPs. An FAQ explains that the purpose of ODPs is “to provide flexibility to federal agencies in tailoring controls to support specific organizational missions or business functions and to manage risk.”

The safeguards are now available in machine-readable formats like JSON and Excel through NIST’s Cybersecurity and Privacy Reference Tool.

“Toolmakers often want to import relevant sections of the guidance directly into an electronic form for easier reference and use,” says NIST’s Ron Ross, one of the authors of the revised document. “Providing the guidance in these additional formats will allow them to do that. It will help a wider group of users to understand the requirements and implement them more quickly and efficiently.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Ambitious biometrics projects need clear roles for success

Biometrics technology development has long been the fixed domain of experts, and while public bodies like NIST have played a…

 

Who holds the keys to digital sovereignty? It might not be who you think

As governments think more about digital identity as a pillar of digital public infrastructure, and therefore a matter of vital…

 

Nigeria wades into social media age assurance debate with pubic survey

A survey has been released by the Nigerian Data Protection Commission to gather feedback on the proposed regulation of a…

 

Spain’s Digital Transformation Ministry backs Sybol with €500k

A Spanish digital transformation agency is helping to fund digital identity development and verifiable credentials. The Spanish Society for Technological…

 

Ethiopia’s digital ID joins sovereign wealth fund as weekly enrollments reach 1M

Ethiopia is accelerating its efforts to reach 90 million digital ID enrollments this year, with the National ID Program (NIDP)…

 

Vendors push deeper into high assurance identity verification

Digital identity vendors are accelerating product integrations as businesses look for stronger, more seamless ways to verify users across sectors….

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events