FB pixel

Illinois heads off accrual precedent for biometric data privacy damages

White Castle to pay out $9.4M in settlement
Illinois heads off accrual precedent for biometric data privacy damages
 

Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) has been officially amended, with Governor J.B. Pritzker signing the changes into law on Friday. The amendments included in Senate Bill 2979 include the acceptance of digital signatures for consent, and make each single violation count only ones, even if it repeated.

The change in accrual means that businesses do not face separate damages for each day a particular employee clocked into work on a biometric time and attendance device, for example.

State lawmakers said the change will provide certainty for Illinois’ businesses, while still protecting their biometric data, reports The Center Square.

“But it adds much needed clarity that helps small businesses operate in a more predictable regulatory environment,” said State Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid when the amendment was approved in the legislature. “I know that many small business owners will be relieved to see this measure pass.”

The accrual issue was central to several court battles over BIPA, notably including a class action against White Castle that could have cost the company $17 billion in damages, if each biometric scan represented a new violation.

Several similar attempts to amend BIPA have come up short.

SB 2979 was a direct response to the White Castle case, Baker Donelson Of Counsel David J. Oberly told Biometric Update in an email when it was approved by lawmakers.

Where’s the beef?

The settlement between White Castle and close to 9,000 current and former employees is complete, with a federal judge signing off on the agreement, Law360 reports. The burger chain will pay $9.39 million in damages, including $3.5 million for plaintiffs’ attorneys.

None of the class members chose to opt out of the settlement, which the judge said indicates the fairness of the settlement.

When Illinois’ Supreme Court ruled that the language of BIPA forced it to side with plaintiffs on accrual last year, it invited legislators to fix the mess they had created.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Governance, not tech, needs interrogating in UK digital ID consultation: Tony Allen

Few people in the world, if any, know as much about age assurance as Tony Allen, the chief executive of…

 

FIDO Alliance to start work on interoperable standards for agentic commerce

The FIDO Alliance has announced initiatives to develop interoperable standards for agentic interactions and commerce, and it has a new…

 

Police policy on facial recognition use earns OK in Lawton, needed in Sante Fe

The Lawton, Oklahoma City Council approved a policy governing police use of facial recognition technology (FRT), moving the city closer…

 

EU recommends white label age verification app, but member states are wary

The European Commission really wants member states to adopt its white label age verification app – and quickly. This week,…

 

Amadeus unveils planned €1.2B Idemia PS acquisition to extend travel biometrics

Amadeus IT SA has officially declared its intention to acquire Idemia Public Security for 1.2  billion euros (approximately US$1.4 billion)…

 

Synthetic voice attacks challenge trust across platforms and systems

A parent has related an unsettling experience they had on Roblox. The father says he heard adults using AI‑generated child…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events