FB pixel

Illinois heads off accrual precedent for biometric data privacy damages

White Castle to pay out $9.4M in settlement
Illinois heads off accrual precedent for biometric data privacy damages
 

Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) has been officially amended, with Governor J.B. Pritzker signing the changes into law on Friday. The amendments included in Senate Bill 2979 include the acceptance of digital signatures for consent, and make each single violation count only ones, even if it repeated.

The change in accrual means that businesses do not face separate damages for each day a particular employee clocked into work on a biometric time and attendance device, for example.

State lawmakers said the change will provide certainty for Illinois’ businesses, while still protecting their biometric data, reports The Center Square.

“But it adds much needed clarity that helps small businesses operate in a more predictable regulatory environment,” said State Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid when the amendment was approved in the legislature. “I know that many small business owners will be relieved to see this measure pass.”

The accrual issue was central to several court battles over BIPA, notably including a class action against White Castle that could have cost the company $17 billion in damages, if each biometric scan represented a new violation.

Several similar attempts to amend BIPA have come up short.

SB 2979 was a direct response to the White Castle case, Baker Donelson Of Counsel David J. Oberly told Biometric Update in an email when it was approved by lawmakers.

Where’s the beef?

The settlement between White Castle and close to 9,000 current and former employees is complete, with a federal judge signing off on the agreement, Law360 reports. The burger chain will pay $9.39 million in damages, including $3.5 million for plaintiffs’ attorneys.

None of the class members chose to opt out of the settlement, which the judge said indicates the fairness of the settlement.

When Illinois’ Supreme Court ruled that the language of BIPA forced it to side with plaintiffs on accrual last year, it invited legislators to fix the mess they had created.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometric Update Podcast: Claire Ma explores the next phase of government digital identity

Governments around the world are moving toward digital identity systems, but not all are taking the same path. On the…

 

Trusted Caller ID with digital wallet and VCs improves call center authentication

Decentralized digital IDs shared from a digital wallet on a smartphone can significantly speed up identity verification by call centers,…

 

EES records 66M border crossings in first six months despite rollout friction

During its first six months of operation of Europe’s biometric-based Entry-Exit System (EES), daily fingerprint checks against EU databases rose…

 

IDDEEA outlines role of e-signatures in Bosnia’s digital transformation

Qualified electronic signatures (QES) have the potential to bring significant improvements to complex, fragmented public administrations like those in Bosnia…

 

Luxembourg opens tender for AI-generated content detection tool

Luxembourg’s Ministry of Digitalization has opened a call for solutions to develop a deepfake detection platform intended to support the…

 

Dutch court backs DigiD contract renewal amid U.S. CLOUD Act fears

A Dutch court has ruled that the government may extend its contract with Solvinity, a key infrastructure provider for the…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events