FB pixel

Yoti trumpets NIST age estimation results and testing plans

Yoti trumpets NIST age estimation results and testing plans
 

A new facial age estimation algorithm submitted by Yoti to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has placed first and second for accuracy in a couple of key categories.

NIST updated its Face Analysis Technology Evaluation (FATE) Age Estimation & Verification on October 7.

Yoti scored the lowest weighted average mean absolute error (WAMAE), at 1.88, and true positive rate (TPR), at 0.57, for children 13 to 16 years old with the algorithm it submitted on September 24. The same algorithm also placed third-best in false positive rate (FPR) for 8 to 12 year-olds at 0.083, and for FPR in the Challenge 25 scenario with the better quality “Application” data set (0.072±0.018), and fourth with the medium-quality “Border” dataset (0.190±0.029).

The company was among the original crop of age estimation providers to have their technology assessed by NIST earlier this year, and also scored well in child online safety in that test.

NIST has tested 13 algorithms from 11 vendors, and Yoti Co-founder and CEO Robin Tombs notes eight other companies that have developed face biometric age estimation in a LinkedIn post. He also shared internal test data.

Tombs revealed in the post that the UK Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS) is also now testing the company’s biometrics-based age estimation with data from 18-year-olds captured on mobile phones. Tombs says Yoti will also request a test for children aged 6 to 17 as soon as ACCS has consented test data.

The company also delved into the relationship between true and false positive rate and true and false negative rate in a recent blog post on the nuance invited by the question: “How accurate is it?”

Facial age estimation the choice of roughly 2 in 3

Yoti Chief Policy and Regulatory Officer Julie Dawson discussed policy trends, how different forms of age assurance differ from each other and why the data involved in facial age estimation does not qualify as biometric data under GDPR with DIACC President Joni Brennan in a new episode of the Trust Talks & Digital Dives podcast.

Dawson emphasizes how transparency, such as that provided by Yoti’s self-testing and NIST’s evaluations, contributes to trust in the technology.

When people are given a choice between several age assurance options, 65 percent or more tend to choose facial age estimation, Dawson says.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

UK gov’t seeks covert surveillance tech in benefit fraud crackdown

The UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has published a £2 million (US$2.7 million) tender seeking software and hardware…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events