FB pixel

Yoti trumpets NIST age estimation results and testing plans

Yoti trumpets NIST age estimation results and testing plans
 

A new facial age estimation algorithm submitted by Yoti to the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology has placed first and second for accuracy in a couple of key categories.

NIST updated its Face Analysis Technology Evaluation (FATE) Age Estimation & Verification on October 7.

Yoti scored the lowest weighted average mean absolute error (WAMAE), at 1.88, and true positive rate (TPR), at 0.57, for children 13 to 16 years old with the algorithm it submitted on September 24. The same algorithm also placed third-best in false positive rate (FPR) for 8 to 12 year-olds at 0.083, and for FPR in the Challenge 25 scenario with the better quality “Application” data set (0.072±0.018), and fourth with the medium-quality “Border” dataset (0.190±0.029).

The company was among the original crop of age estimation providers to have their technology assessed by NIST earlier this year, and also scored well in child online safety in that test.

NIST has tested 13 algorithms from 11 vendors, and Yoti Co-founder and CEO Robin Tombs notes eight other companies that have developed face biometric age estimation in a LinkedIn post. He also shared internal test data.

Tombs revealed in the post that the UK Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS) is also now testing the company’s biometrics-based age estimation with data from 18-year-olds captured on mobile phones. Tombs says Yoti will also request a test for children aged 6 to 17 as soon as ACCS has consented test data.

The company also delved into the relationship between true and false positive rate and true and false negative rate in a recent blog post on the nuance invited by the question: “How accurate is it?”

Facial age estimation the choice of roughly 2 in 3

Yoti Chief Policy and Regulatory Officer Julie Dawson discussed policy trends, how different forms of age assurance differ from each other and why the data involved in facial age estimation does not qualify as biometric data under GDPR with DIACC President Joni Brennan in a new episode of the Trust Talks & Digital Dives podcast.

Dawson emphasizes how transparency, such as that provided by Yoti’s self-testing and NIST’s evaluations, contributes to trust in the technology.

When people are given a choice between several age assurance options, 65 percent or more tend to choose facial age estimation, Dawson says.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

DHS signals major expansion of biometric matching infrastructure

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking industry input on biometric matching software…

 

ROC impresses in NIST biometric age estimation benchmark, Shufti makes debut

Two new entrants to NIST’s Face Analysis Technology Evaluation (FATE) Age Estimation & Verification, one a debut and the other…

 

Online dating at risk as romance scams, deepfakes infiltrate platforms

Online dating sites are being flooded with deepfakes and AI content, making it hard for users to distinguish real matches…

 

Police Scotland plans LFR business case, consultation on the way to a decision: SPA

Police Scotland has not yet made a final decision on implementing live facial recognition (LFR) and has instead announced its…

 

With shift in UK online safety policy, Starmer tells Silicon Valley to ‘bring it on’

A new statement from UK prime minister Keir Starmer outlines his government’s plans to continue developing policies and regulations that…

 

Sri Lanka digital ID Master Systems Integrator expected to be named in March

The selection of an Indian firm as Master System Integrator (MSI) for the Sri Lanka Unique Digital Identity (SL-UDI) is…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events