FB pixel

Socure calculates major savings from reduced false positives in AML screening

Socure calculates major savings from reduced false positives in AML screening
 

The costs associated with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations start with integrating and deploying systems that carry out identity verification and other checks during customer onboarding, and end with fines in cases of non-compliance. But the processes in between can be a million-dollar problem without the right screening technology, according to a case study presented in a Socure blog post.

A client turned to Socure to help it strengthen its compliance program after discovering it had accumulated a backlog of 700,000 politically exposed persons (PEP) alerts. PEP checks are performed as part of AML due diligence. In the case of an alert, a manual review is triggered.

Socure describes the client as a “leading investment platform,” and says it estimated the price of clearing its PEP alert backlog at $1 million.

The average AML fine for a money service business in the UK in fiscal 2022-2023 was $1.9 million.

“It’s a delicate balance,” a chief compliance officer told Socure. “You need to catch every true PEP, but you can’t tie up your entire team chasing false positives. Each alert takes time, resources, and skilled analysts to review.”

The $1 million price tag was calculated based on an estimate that would take 28,000 hours of labor by consultants paid $50 an hour (which actually comes out to $1.4 million, but maybe a bulk discount could be applied).

Instead, with Socure’s technology, the company was able to reduce the number of hours it needed to hire consultants for to 571. At $50 per hour, that’s a much more manageable $28,550. The rest were false positives, identified by Socure for a reduction of 99.76 percent.

Socure’s watchlist solution applies a neural network to identify connections the client’s legacy system had missed, according to the post, like spotting different spellings of the same person’s name. The company also recounts discovering five identities all being used at one financial institution by the same PEP.

The software includes granular search policies, watch lists, score thresholds and filtering criteria, and Socure says its AI model continuously learns from the screenings it carries out.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics back digital government gains around the world

Digital government was in the spotlight this week on Biometric Update with the release of the OECD rankings and a…

 

MOSIP delves into biometric data quality considerations

Biometric data quality was in focus at MOSIP Connect 2026 in Rabat, Morocco, from policies for ensuring good enrollment practices…

 

NIST nominee pressed on AI standards, facial recognition oversight

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation on Thursday considered the nomination of Arvind Raman to serve as Under…

 

Trulioo’s Hal Lonas on how he applies aeronautics principles to fighting fraud

Rocket science is routinely held up as the ultimate example of a highly complex discipline. But Trulioo’s Hal Lonas found…

 

Vouched donates MCP-I framework to Decentralized Identity Foundation

An announcement from Seattle-based Vouched says it has formally donated its Model Context Protocol – Identity (MCP-I) framework to the…

 

California’s OS-based age verification law challenges open-source community

California’s new online safety bill, AB 1043 (the Digital Age Assurance Act), adopts a declared age model for operating systems….

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events