FB pixel

NIST updates differential privacy guidelines to enable more data analytics

Categories Biometric R&D  |  Biometrics News
NIST updates differential privacy guidelines to enable more data analytics
 

Guidelines for using differential privacy from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology have been updated to make the privacy protection technology easier to apply.  This in turn will enable data analytics to be applied to more databases containing confidential information.

The technology itself is relatively mature, NIST says, but lacks standards that can make is easy to adopt and use.

Hence the update to NIST’s Guidelines for Evaluating Differential Privacy Guarantees (NIST Special Publication 800-226).

Differential privacy (DP) is a method of obscuring the identity of individuals in datasets while retaining the utility of the database as a source of statistical information, through the addition of random “noise.” The noise has the effect of de-identifying individuals in the dataset.

The technology is well-established as a privacy protection tool, and can be applied to biometrics.

A video shared by NIST gives the example of an emergency call in which a medical crisis is reported. If a cluster of similar medical crises are found through data analysis, a cause could be identified, and perhaps lives saved. But the call contains a bundle of personally identifiable information (PII), and even redacting the most obvious data points like the individual’s name and exact address may not be enough to prevent the re-identification of an individual. This is where the noise added by DP comes in.

NIST’s guidelines are intended to help organizations assess claims DP vendors make. They were originally released in draft form in December of 2023, and have been updated for ease of use.

NIST Scientist Gary Howarth, who co-authored the guidelines, says the update makes the language more precise and less ambiguous to help decision-makers “more clearly understand the trade-offs inherent in DP and can help understand what DP claims mean.”

The guidelines are not a complete primer on the subject, but include a reading list to help practitioners improve their understanding of how DP works.

“With DP there are many gray areas,” Howarth says. “There is no simple answer for how to balance privacy with usefulness. You must answer that every time you apply DP to data. This publication can help you navigate that space.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Pitched as the future of work, agentic AI is not selling well – but fraudsters love it

Everyone wants to talk about agentic AI. Throughout 2025, AI agents have been hailed as both the future of work…

 

Facial age estimation spoof, VPN bypass claims called into question

Reports of the defeat of facial age estimation technology may be greatly exaggerated, and UK children have not flocked to…

 

Reddit users’ questions expose major shortcoming in age assurance effort

 “Am I the only one that’s confused about how they’re going to confirm if you’re a certain age?” So asks…

 

AI fraud threat continues to spur deepfake detection integration, investment, development

Reality Defender and 1Kosmos have announced a strategic partnership that will see the deepfake detection firm integrate its real-time deepfake…

 

iProov, Aware, Paravision power airport biometric boarding pilots at MCO

Airports across the Americas are accelerating their shift to biometric identity systems, with Orlando, Houston and Oklahoma City all rolling…

 

EU and Canada agree to collaborate on digital ID mutual recognition, pilots

Representatives of the European Union and Canada emerged from the meeting of the EU-Canada Digital Partnership Council on Monday with…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events