FB pixel

NIST updates differential privacy guidelines to enable more data analytics

Categories Biometric R&D  |  Biometrics News
NIST updates differential privacy guidelines to enable more data analytics
 

Guidelines for using differential privacy from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology have been updated to make the privacy protection technology easier to apply.  This in turn will enable data analytics to be applied to more databases containing confidential information.

The technology itself is relatively mature, NIST says, but lacks standards that can make is easy to adopt and use.

Hence the update to NIST’s Guidelines for Evaluating Differential Privacy Guarantees (NIST Special Publication 800-226).

Differential privacy (DP) is a method of obscuring the identity of individuals in datasets while retaining the utility of the database as a source of statistical information, through the addition of random “noise.” The noise has the effect of de-identifying individuals in the dataset.

The technology is well-established as a privacy protection tool, and can be applied to biometrics.

A video shared by NIST gives the example of an emergency call in which a medical crisis is reported. If a cluster of similar medical crises are found through data analysis, a cause could be identified, and perhaps lives saved. But the call contains a bundle of personally identifiable information (PII), and even redacting the most obvious data points like the individual’s name and exact address may not be enough to prevent the re-identification of an individual. This is where the noise added by DP comes in.

NIST’s guidelines are intended to help organizations assess claims DP vendors make. They were originally released in draft form in December of 2023, and have been updated for ease of use.

NIST Scientist Gary Howarth, who co-authored the guidelines, says the update makes the language more precise and less ambiguous to help decision-makers “more clearly understand the trade-offs inherent in DP and can help understand what DP claims mean.”

The guidelines are not a complete primer on the subject, but include a reading list to help practitioners improve their understanding of how DP works.

“With DP there are many gray areas,” Howarth says. “There is no simple answer for how to balance privacy with usefulness. You must answer that every time you apply DP to data. This publication can help you navigate that space.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

10 million passkeys registered for Mercari market app amid phishing crisis

Mercari, the Japanese e-commerce company behind the Mercari marketplace, has surpassed 10 million registered users of passkeys for authentication. A…

 

Project NOLA’s facial recognition push raises legal and civil rights questions

This week, the New Orleans City Council’s Criminal Justice Committee is expected to convene a hearing to address concerns about…

 

PNG launches birth registration legislation in landmark for national ID project

Papua New Guinea is taking a concrete step in making sure every citizen is officially recognized and able to access…

 

Yoti improves liveness detection pass rates

Digital identity and age estimation company Yoti has released new figures on its liveness detection technology, showing success rate improvements…

 

Inclusive digital ID poised for leap forward with QR codes, similar credentials

QR codes have been around for decades, but they and other similar technologies have only recently emerged as digital identity…

 

Age assurance debate simmers across EU with calls for stronger measures

Age checks remain in the headlines with new proposals from EU digital ministers to go further with legislation limiting social…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events