FB pixel

China’s supreme court releases facial recognition violation cases in crackdown

China’s supreme court releases facial recognition violation cases in crackdown
 

China’s highest court has upheld the need for stronger protection of personal information, emphasizing to judges the need to maintain the crackdown on those who violate facial recognition rules.

China’s Supreme People’s Court released cases to illustrate examples when the privacy and data security of others were violated and how the perpetrators were penalized.

It comes following a new regulation, “Administrative Measures on the Security of Facial Recognition Technology Application,” which took effect June 1. Published by the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), the measures strengthen face biometric regulation to mandate choice and consent and apply to commercial uses of facial recognition, including hotel check-ins or physical access to gated communities.

One court case involved a man surnamed Xu who purchased the facial images of around 130 individuals online in June 2021. He also acquired software used to bypass facial recognition systems and used it to unblock multiple online gaming accounts. Xu rented out the software and resold the personal data gained from it, earning RMB 6,000 ($838) in the process.

Xu was sentenced to nine months in prison, fined, and had his illegally-made money confiscated along with mobile phones and computers.

Another case involved a man surnamed Li who used software provided by Xu to help others regain access to their blocked social media accounts by using loopholes in facial recognition software, according to China Daily.

Li made RMB 30,000 ($4,179) from reselling facial images and videos. He was sentenced to six months in prison, fined, and also had his money and electronics confiscated.

“The verdict from the lower court demonstrates the judiciary’s firm stance on protecting personal rights and serves as a warning to anyone seeking to illegally sell or provide facial recognition data,” the top court said, according to China Daily.

Lawyers interviewed by China Daily (a government-owned newspaper) suggested that strong enforcement can be carried out through criminal penalties, and in cases where large volumes of personal information are leaked, illegally collected or sold, prosecutors could consider filing public interest lawsuits.

The court also referenced another case where a defendant was sentenced to 37 months in prison after using software to illegally access passwords for 193 home surveillance cameras and took screenshots for personal use. The Supreme People’s Court said the courts should take a “zero tolerance” approach to the illegal control of smart home devices or similar. Judges were advised to hand down strong penalties in such cases.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Biometrics handling new frontiers and changed expectations, from agents to gait

Successes in airport biometrics are driving deployments and expansions all over the world. But the technology cannot perform miracles like…

 

Financial institutions stumbling into phishing-resistant MFA gaps, report warns

Financial institutions seem aware that phishing is worsening, but that awareness has not translated into stronger authentication across the workforce….

 

Proof, Enigma link KYB to authorized people, AI agents with biometrics

Proof and Enigma have launched Business Certificates, a cryptographic credential that connects a verified business identity to the people and…

 

Investors back Lissi, Gataca’s expansions to meet EU Digital Identity Wallet moment

A pair of European digital wallet developers have new resources to pursue market share in the nascent continental ecosystem for…

 

New Incode age estimation tool processes biometrics on-device

Prompted by the introduction of online safety regulations globally, Incode has released an on-device age estimation product. An announcement from…

 

Western Australia privacy commissioner not consulted on police facial recognition trial

The Office of the Information Commissioner of Western Australia (OIC WA) says it was not invited to participate in any…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events