FB pixel

Mexico debates centralizing biometric citizen codes to search for missing persons

Mexico debates centralizing biometric citizen codes to search for missing persons
 

The Mexican government has taken another step toward turning the country’s biometric-based Unique Population Registry Code (Clave Única de Registro de Población – CURP) into an official national identity document and consolidating the unique citizen codes into one platform.

Members of the opposition, however, argue that centralizing biometric data through CURP could create a single point for cyberattacks and open the possibility of mass surveillance.

Last Thursday, the Senate’s joint committees on Government and Legislative Studies voted in favor of amendments to the General Population Law and the General Law on Enforced Disappearances, which would allow the country to gather the citizen identity codes into a single identity platform within 90 days.

The platform will be able to connect to various other state databases and administrative records, including the National Registry of Missing and Unlocated Persons, the National Forensic Data Bank. But it will also connect to databases of employers and social security registries, as well as registries related to “financial, transportation, physical and mental health, telecommunications, education, private assistance, parcel and delivery services,” and more, El Financiero reports.

The biometric version of the CURP integrates biometric data such as face photographs, iris scans and fingerprints.

The Morena government and its allies have argued that the move will allow the country to combat the alarming trend of disappearances: The number of missing persons in Mexico is estimated to be over 111,000, while authorities have been discovering secret mass graves and cremation sites.

To speed up searches, government authorities and individuals who manage biometric databases will be required to provide information to agencies such as the Attorney General’s Office, state prosecutors’ offices, the National Intelligence Center, and other law enforcement agencies. CURPs will be able to be monitored in “real time to allow for comprehensive searches. According to the new regulation, the Ministry of the Interior will also integrate biometric data of children into the National Population Registry.

The new amendments still have to go through legislative procedure, where they are likely to meet resistance from members of PAN (National Action Party) and PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party).

“They’re trying to give the federal government the ability to type in your CURP and have access to information about any Mexican,” says PAN member Ricardo Anaya.

Other opposition figures claim that the government cannot guarantee that personal data will be protected. Although Mexican law says that data for CURP must be collected with consent, those who refuse to provide data are likely to remain stuck in bureaucratic limbo, according to  PRI member Claudia Anaya.

Biometric data security has been a point of contention in Mexican politics. In 2021, the Supreme Court declared a biometric-based national register of mobile telephone users unconstitutional.

Civil rights groups have also noted that vulnerable groups who do not obtain a biometric CURP could be excluded from government services.

CURP’s planned transformation from a reference document to an identity document could also bring other changes. The new CURP, for instance, will be linked to the National Health System Registry and possibly other registries.

According to the currently debated Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law, mobile service providers will only be able to activate services for consumers who present an ID document containing a CURP. While the Mexican Association of Virtual Mobile Operators (AMONVAC) supports the regulation, some critics have questioned whether the move will represent an invasion of users’ privacy, according to El Economista.

Turning CUPR into an identity document could also make some other documents obsolete, including Voter ID cards.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events