FB pixel

Mexican state biometric population registry sees high acceptance

Veracruz residents lining up for non-mandatory ID system, critics worry about data security
Mexican state biometric population registry sees high acceptance
 

The Mexican state of Veracruz is seeing high levels of interest from its population in the biometric version of the Unique Population Registry Code (CURP). The Civil Registry of Veracruz is seeing 70 requests a day, according to local authorities.

A CURP number is a unique code that identifies all Mexican citizens and residents. The new and improved version of the CURP integrates biometric data such as photographs, iris scans and fingerprints. The innovation was introduced to combat identity theft and strengthen security in public records.

The state of Veracruz, with a population of over 8 million, is the first to start implementing the system. Although the biometric CURP is not obligatory, residents have been lining up to complete the registration procedure, El Dictamen reports. The biometric code is used not only for identification purposes but also to access scholarships and pension programs.

The biometric CURP is expected to be introduced in other Mexican states during 2025. The new measure, however, has ignited debates about security and privacy. 

Biometric data security has been a point of contention in Mexican politics. In 2021, the Supreme Court declared a biometric-based national register of mobile telephone users unconstitutional. Centralizing biometric data through CURP could create a single point for cyberattacks and open the possibility of mass biometric surveillance, according to media outlet Expansión.

Digital rights group R3D also notes that the vulnerable groups who do not obtain biometric CURP could be excluded from government services.

The creation of the new CURP is also linked to the National Registration and Identity System, approved in 2023 with the General Law on the Operations of Civil Records. The centralized database holds birth, death, marriage, adoption and divorce records, collecting citizen data including biometrics.

The system was criticized for allowing data transfers to any public, private and financial unit approved by the Ministry of the Interior. Groups such as R3D believe that the rule raises the risk of fraud and biometric data theft.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Germany debates social media ban for under-16s

Social media age restrictions are getting traction in more and more jurisdictions. The latest to consider the move is an…

 

What could make the EU Digital Identity Wallets fail?

The EU Digital Identity Wallet has enormous potential, but its success cannot be taken for granted. Insufficient ecosystem buy-in, unclear…

 

Ring and Flock call off integration as scrutiny of camera-to-police partnership intensifies

Amazon-owned Ring and Flock Safety have canceled their planned partnership, stepping back from an integration that would have linked one…

 

MOSIP pursues democratization of digital identity with unconference conversations

A democratic vision of digital identity is central to the non-profit, open-source mandate of MOSIP. As the organization and the…

 

Liveness is king: FaceTec’s Jay Meier in conversation with Chris Burt 

It’s best, says Jay Meier, to think about identity management as a system of symbiotic systems. Which is to say,…

 

Ofcom fines Kick, threatens 4chan as OSA enforcement steadily dials up

UK regulator Ofcom has faced criticism for being too slow and lenient with its power to enforce the Online Safety…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

DIGITAL ID for ALL NEWS

Featured Company

ID for ALL FEATURE REPORTS

BIOMETRICS WHITE PAPERS

BIOMETRICS EVENTS

EXPLAINING BIOMETRICS