FB pixel

Report warns retailers to consider consumer privacy laws when deploying facial recognition tools

 

Many vendors of biometrics-based solutions have not anticipated legal and compliance challenges posed by their products, or expressly deny responsibility for those challenges, leading to increased legal action, according to the National Law Review. The article “Buyer Beware: Facial Recognition and the Current Legal Landscape” urges U.S. retailers to be prepared for consumer privacy laws to evolve as they consider implementing such technologies.

The article was authored by partners of law firm Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, and compares the current context for biometrics with that of the earliest text messaging marketing programs. The programs were bought by retailers from mobile marketing vendors, “which led to a flurry of class action activity that challenged compliance and the sufficiency of consent under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA),” according to the authors.

Illinois, Texas, and Washington are the only states with comprehensive biometric information laws, and no such federal law exists, however litigation involving biometrics has been filed against United Airlines, Intercontinental Hotels, Facebook, Hyatt, Bob Evans Restaurants, and dozens of other companies, all under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). Many other states have considered such regulation, according to the Review, and a coalition which lobbied against the Montana Biometric Information Privacy Act noted “a huge risk of costly class action[s].”

The article deals extensively with BIPA, but also notes the introduction of the Consumer Privacy Protection Act in November 2017 by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) with six co-sponsors. The proposed legislation explicitly includes biometric data, and would empower the FTC, federal Attorney General, and state Attorneys General to bring enforcement actions. It is currently before several committees and subcommittees.

While the article recommends that retailers consider how they will obtain consent to use biometrics, how they will treat the data from collection through disposal, and how they will prevent data breach damage it also urges them when necessary to obtain written agreements with vendors covering indemnification provisions and insurance requirements.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Digital sovereignty, infrastructure and credential formats colliding

Digital credential formats are on the verge of being sucked into a global debate over the nature of sovereignty with…

 

Digital ID for alcohol sales is coming to the UK: hear what it means for the identity sector

For about two years now, leaders in the UK have been promising that, soon, people will be able to use…

 

Ant International, Visa, Mastercard work to make agentic protocols interoperable 

Ant International, Mastercard and Visa are collaborating on a Know-Your-Agent (KYA) interoperability framework, which a release says is “designed to…

 

Unico acquires biometrics provider Valida, gaining entry into Argentina market

Unico has announced it signed a definitive agreement to acquire Valida, “an Argentine biometric identity verification platform with an established…

 

KPMG investment in Reality Defender backs hiring spree to fight deepfakes

U.S.-based KPMG LLP has taken a minority stake in deepfake detection developer Reality Defender and plans to integrate its fraud-protecting…

 

Australia expands eSafety powers, doubles penalties in platform accountability push

Australia’s parliament has formally passed the Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026, granting…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events