FB pixel

Report warns retailers to consider consumer privacy laws when deploying facial recognition tools

 

Many vendors of biometrics-based solutions have not anticipated legal and compliance challenges posed by their products, or expressly deny responsibility for those challenges, leading to increased legal action, according to the National Law Review. The article “Buyer Beware: Facial Recognition and the Current Legal Landscape” urges U.S. retailers to be prepared for consumer privacy laws to evolve as they consider implementing such technologies.

The article was authored by partners of law firm Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, and compares the current context for biometrics with that of the earliest text messaging marketing programs. The programs were bought by retailers from mobile marketing vendors, “which led to a flurry of class action activity that challenged compliance and the sufficiency of consent under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA),” according to the authors.

Illinois, Texas, and Washington are the only states with comprehensive biometric information laws, and no such federal law exists, however litigation involving biometrics has been filed against United Airlines, Intercontinental Hotels, Facebook, Hyatt, Bob Evans Restaurants, and dozens of other companies, all under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). Many other states have considered such regulation, according to the Review, and a coalition which lobbied against the Montana Biometric Information Privacy Act noted “a huge risk of costly class action[s].”

The article deals extensively with BIPA, but also notes the introduction of the Consumer Privacy Protection Act in November 2017 by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) with six co-sponsors. The proposed legislation explicitly includes biometric data, and would empower the FTC, federal Attorney General, and state Attorneys General to bring enforcement actions. It is currently before several committees and subcommittees.

While the article recommends that retailers consider how they will obtain consent to use biometrics, how they will treat the data from collection through disposal, and how they will prevent data breach damage it also urges them when necessary to obtain written agreements with vendors covering indemnification provisions and insurance requirements.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

NZ Parliamentary Committee recommends age assurance for social media

Age assurance should be required for people accessing social media in New Zealand to keep people under 16 away from…

 

EU kicks off panel discussions on social media age restrictions

The European Commission has taken another step towards regulating child safety online, organizing the first panel on age restrictions for…

 

EU can rein in AI agents with EUDI Wallets and business wallets: WE BUILD

The EU should take a coordinated approach to integrating AI agents into digital transactions, with special attention on payments, according…

 

Indonesia to ban under-16s from social media, implement standard-based age checks

Indonesia, the biggest country in Southeast Asia, is taking the momentous step to ban social media for under 16s. Communication…

 

GenKey takes over biometric passport, national ID card production in Comoros

East African archipelago nation Comoros has selected GenKey to produce its biometric passports and national ID cards. GenKey replaces Semlex,…

 

India mandates medical colleges to issue ABHA patient IDs in digital health push

India’s National Medical Commission (NMC) has directed that all medical colleges must generate and issue patient IDs to all those…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events