FB pixel

Privacy researcher ordered to return 20 accidentally shared pages on NYPD facial biometric system

Privacy researcher ordered to return 20 accidentally shared pages on NYPD facial biometric system
 

Researchers at Georgetown University’s Center on Privacy and Technology must return 20 pages of confidential information about its biometric facial identification systems accidentally given to them by the New York Police Department after a legal ruling by Manhattan District Justice Shlomo Hagler, New York Daily News reports.

Center on Privacy and Technology (CPT) attorney Clare Garvie obtained the documents as part of a two-year effort to force disclosure of the system’s details. Hagler ruled that Garvie can speak about the information, but cannot specifically reference the documents which he said were clearly shared in “inadvertent error.” That puts Garvie in a difficult situation.

“I rely on the information I learn through reviewing these records to write academic papers, raise awareness about the use of face recognition, and train public defenders,” she said. “But I’m now faced with being able to speak about the information I’ve learned but I can’t back up my assertions. the information has essentially become useless.”

Garvie says the NYPD’s disclosures have been inconsistent and selective, with a Dataworks Plus facial recognition program user guide given to the CPT after heavy redaction, but given unredacted to attorneys in a separate lawsuit. She also notes that information was presented at a conference last September, but then considered too sensitive to disclose for the lawsuit.

Hagler noted that the NYPD should be more diligent. The force originally responded to a request from the CPT for information on its facial biometrics use by saying it could not find relevant records, before ultimately providing 3,700 pages of documents.

“Our request to retrieve certain information was in large measure to protect the privacy rights of individuals and entities whose information and records were released in error,” an NYPD spokesperson said. The spokesperson also said that that the NYPD does not engage in mass image collection from camera systems, does not collect images from the internet or social media, and has never arrested anyone on the basis of a facial biometric match alone.

The Intercept has reported that NYPD surveillance cameras were used to collect data used for technology development by IBM.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Alan Goode offers insights on booming transitional IDV market on BU Podcast

Technology is transforming identity verification. According to Alan Goode of Goode Intelligence, by 2030, digital identity verification will pass traditional…

 

Share less data in more places: inching towards decentralized digital ID for travel

The travel industry is slowly shifting to a more decentralized model of digital identity. This was one of the key…

 

Clearview takes fresh legal hits over Canada class action, UK fine

Few biometrics companies have taken a bigger regulatory and legal beating than Clearview AI. It has already been a rough…

 

Mexico makes biometric identifier mandatory for all citizens

Mexico has officially introduced a digital identification system by signing a law that turned the previously optional biometric-based citizen code…

 

MOSIP highlights the UN DPI Safeguards Initiative

The United Nations’ DPI Safeguards Initiative has released 259 recommendations designed to guide regulators, advocates, donors, technology providers and governments…

 

Brazil adopts DaaS for verifiable credentials

Brazil is the latest country to adopt DPI as a Packaged Solution (DaaS) — a practical framework designed to accelerate…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events