FB pixel

3 proctoring app makers fidget as they are tested

Categories Biometric R&D  |  Biometrics News  |  Schools  |  Trade Notes


If darting eyes are a possible sign of anxiety (and they are), there are makers of three automated biometric proctoring applications who might want to avoid taking monitored tests for a while.

Executives of three app makers, Proctorio, ProctorU and Respondus, are in the hot seat over allegations of biased biometric algorithms, inadequate security and data privacy violations, respectively.

Proctoring apps can watch for behaviors that indicate someone is more anxious than might be expected, for example. That test takers have done or plan to do something that they might later regret.


According to an article in Vice, a software researcher claims he can show that the facial recognition algorithm in Proctorio’s app does not recognize people of color at least half the time.

Researcher Akash Satheesan saw that the names of the company’s Chrome browser extensions were the same as those in open source computer vision software library OpenCV. Biometric facial recognition and detection built on OpenCV, according to Vice, have proved biased.

A Proctorio spokesperson reportedly hedged on how OpenCV, for which the company has a license, is implemented in the proctoring app.


ProctorU executives are facing accusations of a sloppy browser extension software, too.

Online publication CyberScoop has reported that US Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) maneuvered leaders of ProctorU into getting an independent security audit for its software, which monitor students taking the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) battery.

Wyden has said he is not convinced that ProctorU has taken the precautions needed to keep hackers from gaining access to test takers’ devices via the proctoring extension.

According to CyberScoop, the Law School Admissions Council, which administers the LSAT, has said it has heard no complaints about ProctorU software wandering through students’ computers.

Executives did not have a lot of room to ignore the request. Just last year, ProctorU was hit by a data breach.


And, finally, Respondus, which is involved in multiple biometric data privacy lawsuits in Illinois, wants a federal judge there to let it destroy video recordings potentially relevant to the cases.

Plaintiffs allege that Respondus’ software violates the state’s Biometric Information Privacy Act. Access to several years of the data in question is needed for the discovery portion of the cases, according to Law360.

The problem is that the firm’s standard contract requires that all data gathered in a proctoring session must be deleted within five years of creation.

On deadline, the judge had not decided the matter, having orders both sides to depose a Respondus employee to find out what is in the records and how they are maintained.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News


Biometrics deployments expand protection against fraud and lying about your age

Biometrics are protecting against false claims of all sorts in several of the most-read articles of the past week on…


UN says law enforcement should not use biometrics to surveil protestors

Law enforcement agencies should not use biometric technology to categorize, profile or remotely identify individuals during protests, the United Nations…


How to explain the EUDI Wallet? Industry and citizens discuss Europe’s digital ID

The European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallet is well on its way towards becoming a reality. To explain the major impact…


Decentralize face authentication for control, stronger protection: Youverse

The implementation method of biometric face authentication has become increasingly important in recent years due to the limitations of traditional…


Researchers develop display screens with biometric sensor capabilities

Traditional display screens like those built into smartphones require extra sensors for touch control, ambient light, and fingerprint sensing. These…


Meta, porn industry and Kansas governor weigh in on age verification

As Europe mulls how to restrict access to certain content for minors, Meta offers its own solution. Meanwhile, U.S. states…


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read From This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events