FB pixel

Cyberfraud victim advocates fear biometrics buyers rushing to deploy

Cyberfraud victim advocates fear biometrics buyers rushing to deploy
 

Where biometrics is being adopted to protect U.S. consumers, too many deployments are reflexive and poorly thought out, according to an advocate for crime victims.

Much to the chagrin of many biometrics system vendors and integrators, the Identity Theft Resource Center, says in a white paper that “wider adoption of biometrics alone will not reduce all manner of identity crimes.”

A more-reasoned approach is required, according to the center, one that differentiates between facial verification and facial recognition.

The market in the United States (and elsewhere) is new enough and chaotic enough that system buyers don’t always know the difference between verification and recognition. There are costs to this, the center says.

Center executives are pushing verification as an optimal choice for confirming a consumer’s identity, one that may not get enough consideration. Facial recognition, of course, is largely an involuntary government surveillance tool around the world with greater privacy risks compared to verification, which is voluntary.

While some consumers are growing uneasy with the idea of facial recognition, making verification more palatable, another consideration favors verification, too.

One of the best ways to prevent theft of biometric data is to treat the information like a hot potato and drop it as soon as possible. With verification, the data can be recorded, compared and almost immediately deleted.

And verification is an effective tool for fighting fraud that is based on the mountains of stolen data that already exists online.

In the white paper, the center says ID verification, which typically involves comparing government facial images with a live selfie, “will make a significant difference in identity crimes committed with stolen, static data.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Swiss e-ID resists rushing trust infrastructure

Switzerland is debating on how to proceed with the technical implementation of its national digital identity as the 2026 deadline…

 

Former Jumio exec joins digital ID web 3.0 project

Move over Worldcoin, there’s a new kid on the block vying for the attention of the digital identity industry and…

 

DHS audit urges upgrade of biometric vetting for noncitizens and asylum seekers

A recent audit by the DHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) has called for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)…

 

Researchers spotlight Russia’s opaque facial recognition surveillance system

In recent years, Russia has been attracting attention for its use of facial recognition surveillance to track down protestors, opposition…

 

Estonia digital identity wallet app from Cybernetica lifts off

Tallinn-based Cybernetica has submitted the minimum viable product (MVP) for Estonia’s national digital identity wallet to the Estonian Information System…

 

Chinese investor accuses HumanCode AI and Redrock Biometrics of IP abuse

Forgame Holdings Limited, a company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and a shareholder of Redrock Biometrics, is initiating…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events