FB pixel

Biometrics can be biased but how biased? Researchers propose a ruler

Biometrics can be biased but how biased? Researchers propose a ruler
 

Researchers in the United States say they have created a statistical method for “rigorous statistical comparison” for spotting differences among demographic groups. Their math would be applicable to fighting bias in biometric algorithms.

Having one or more standard ways to measure bias would be a boon for many AI sectors, but particularly facial recognition, where biases are known to lurk.

The researchers are from Clarkson University and St. Lawrence University, and include prominent figures in biometrics like Michael Schuckers, Charles A. Dana Professor of Statistics and Data Science and Stephanie Schuckers, a recent panelist on Biometric Update’s webinar on responsible and ethical commercial biometrics. It was supported by Clarkson’s Center for Identification Technology Research, better known as CITeR. A National Science Foundation grant helped pay for the work.

The code they wrote looks for “statistically distinguishable” rates of false non-matches, or FNMR.

“We think of fairness as meaning that the FNMR’s are not statistically different across one or more demographic categories,” the team wrote in their paper.

The method involves bootstrapping individuals across the different demographic groups and measure the variation of error rates in each, and then building “a distribution of the maximal variation for the overall error rate.”

The result, they say, is that they can “determine which, if any, groups have error rates that differ from the rest.”

The method can make simultaneous comparisons  in racial, education and age demographics in situation where individual are “classified into one category within each of those groups.”

Despite no small amount of consternation in the industry and among the public about biased algorithms, the team said, there has been “little work in this area incorporating statistical variation.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

WSO2 to help MOSIP’s passwordless authentication platform eSignet Go Thunder

IIIT-Bangalore, home to India’s burgeoning digital public goods efforts, has formed a partnership through the MOSIP initiative it hosts with…

 

Iran marries surveillance infrastructure, national ID to control population: report

The Iranian regime has been leveraging tools from its digital public infrastructure (DPI), combining them with its limited network of…

 

Ping’s Rusbridge says the agent economy needs zero-trust evolution, not revolution

The agent economy is replacing the digital economy the world is still adjusting to, Ping Identity Group Product Manager Adam…

 

Entrust face biometrics show major gains in NIST FRTE

A face biometrics algorithm submitted by Entrust to the NIST Face Recognition Technology Evaluation (FRTE) 1:1 Verification has made significant…

 

Use of digital ID to access essential services jumps in Ireland

Digital ID is now commonplace in Ireland, becoming mainstream among the Irish public who are turning to digital services more…

 

Malaysia targets 17 million MyDigital IDs by end-2026

Malaysia is ramping up targets for its national digital ID system. The country aims to reach 17 million MyDigital ID…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events