FB pixel

Biometrics can be biased but how biased? Researchers propose a ruler

Biometrics can be biased but how biased? Researchers propose a ruler
 

Researchers in the United States say they have created a statistical method for “rigorous statistical comparison” for spotting differences among demographic groups. Their math would be applicable to fighting bias in biometric algorithms.

Having one or more standard ways to measure bias would be a boon for many AI sectors, but particularly facial recognition, where biases are known to lurk.

The researchers are from Clarkson University and St. Lawrence University, and include prominent figures in biometrics like Michael Schuckers, Charles A. Dana Professor of Statistics and Data Science and Stephanie Schuckers, a recent panelist on Biometric Update’s webinar on responsible and ethical commercial biometrics. It was supported by Clarkson’s Center for Identification Technology Research, better known as CITeR. A National Science Foundation grant helped pay for the work.

The code they wrote looks for “statistically distinguishable” rates of false non-matches, or FNMR.

“We think of fairness as meaning that the FNMR’s are not statistically different across one or more demographic categories,” the team wrote in their paper.

The method involves bootstrapping individuals across the different demographic groups and measure the variation of error rates in each, and then building “a distribution of the maximal variation for the overall error rate.”

The result, they say, is that they can “determine which, if any, groups have error rates that differ from the rest.”

The method can make simultaneous comparisons  in racial, education and age demographics in situation where individual are “classified into one category within each of those groups.”

Despite no small amount of consternation in the industry and among the public about biased algorithms, the team said, there has been “little work in this area incorporating statistical variation.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

GAO: Cybersecurity workforce management falls short, impacting security across the board

A new U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit found that despite notable advancements, federal departments still face substantial barriers to…

 

Pakistan switches digital ID applications from website to mobile app

Pakistan’s National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) is closing down its public service website and launching a mobile app to…

 

Next Biometrics: quarterlies, annuals, regulatory

January 17, 2025 – Changes to Aadhaar’s biometrics rules have prompted a temporary pause in Indian business that Next Biometrics says…

 

Biometric authentication required for SIM card registration in India and Thailand

Following a spike in mobile telecommunications fraud and other related crimes, the government of India has directed that all new…

 

Biden executive order prioritizes privacy-preserving digital ID, mDLs

In one of his last official acts as President, Joe Biden on Thursday issued a robust new executive order (EO)…

 

Problem with police use of facial recognition isn’t with the biometrics

A major investigation by the Washington Post has revealed that police in the U.S. regularly use facial recognition as the…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events