FB pixel

Application of BIPA amendment to pending biometric data privacy cases disputed

Application of BIPA amendment to pending biometric data privacy cases disputed
 

Plaintiffs and defendants are arguing over whether an amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act limiting liability to one count for each biometric process applies to cases currently before the courts.

State legislators amended BIPA earlier this year to make clear that violations do not accrue with repeated scans of exactly the same type.

Now, plaintiffs in a pair of cases have filed motions asking for a federal court to reject a ruling that the change applies to all cases not yet settled.  That ruling was made by Judge Elanie E. Bucklo of the Northern District of Illinois last week, Law360 reports.

Separate lawsuits involving Sabert Corp., a food service company and Viking SupplyNet, a sprinkler parts distributor, accuse the businesses of violating BIPA’s informed consent requirements when scanning employee’s fingerprints for biometric time and attendance tracking.

Bucklo ruled that the amendment applies to a lawsuit she was presiding over against Central Transport LLC, and the two above companies each argued that the same criteria apply to them. That means the potential damages do not meet the $75,000 threshold for federal diversity jurisdiction, and the suits should therefore be dismissed.

The plaintiffs in both cases argue that five state court decisions differ from Bucklo’s, and must be taken into account.

The companies returned that those decisions were “mixed,” and plaintiffs fired back that their claims are “inaccurate and misleading.” Four of the decisions issued since October were “persuasive reasoned decisions,” plaintiffs argue.

The difference in interpretation comes from Bucklo’s contention that the amendment was made in response to a call for clarification from the State Supreme Court, and therefore applies to all cases from that time forward. The amendment does not include language specifying that it applies retroactively.

Further motions or appeals could follow.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Idaho law limits use of digital ID, bans compelled adoption

Idaho Governor Brad Little has signed into law Senate Bill 1299, which limits how public entities can use digital identification…

 

Rhode Island bills push age verification, limits for minors online

Rhode Island lawmakers are pressing ahead with a broad package of child online safety legislation that would impose new rules…

 

iDen2, Carahsoft deal brings decentralized digital identity platform to US agencies

iDen2 has entered a strategic partnership with Carahsoft Technology Corp. to expand the availability of its platform across U.S. government…

 

Breaking down the European Commission’s white label age verification app

The European Commission’s white label age verification app is technically ready  – but what does it do? Day two of…

 

Innovatrics’ VC backs biometric driver monitoring startup Mettis AI

Biometric Ventures, the venture capital arm of biometrics company Innovatrics, has invested in Mettis AI, a Spanish startup developing AI-based driver monitoring…

 

Researchers map emotional signatures in gait as footstep biometrics gain momentum

A new study has identified specific gait patterns that directly shape how people perceive emotion, which could translate into potential…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events