FB pixel

Application of BIPA amendment to pending biometric data privacy cases disputed

Application of BIPA amendment to pending biometric data privacy cases disputed
 

Plaintiffs and defendants are arguing over whether an amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act limiting liability to one count for each biometric process applies to cases currently before the courts.

State legislators amended BIPA earlier this year to make clear that violations do not accrue with repeated scans of exactly the same type.

Now, plaintiffs in a pair of cases have filed motions asking for a federal court to reject a ruling that the change applies to all cases not yet settled.  That ruling was made by Judge Elanie E. Bucklo of the Northern District of Illinois last week, Law360 reports.

Separate lawsuits involving Sabert Corp., a food service company and Viking SupplyNet, a sprinkler parts distributor, accuse the businesses of violating BIPA’s informed consent requirements when scanning employee’s fingerprints for biometric time and attendance tracking.

Bucklo ruled that the amendment applies to a lawsuit she was presiding over against Central Transport LLC, and the two above companies each argued that the same criteria apply to them. That means the potential damages do not meet the $75,000 threshold for federal diversity jurisdiction, and the suits should therefore be dismissed.

The plaintiffs in both cases argue that five state court decisions differ from Bucklo’s, and must be taken into account.

The companies returned that those decisions were “mixed,” and plaintiffs fired back that their claims are “inaccurate and misleading.” Four of the decisions issued since October were “persuasive reasoned decisions,” plaintiffs argue.

The difference in interpretation comes from Bucklo’s contention that the amendment was made in response to a call for clarification from the State Supreme Court, and therefore applies to all cases from that time forward. The amendment does not include language specifying that it applies retroactively.

Further motions or appeals could follow.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

FIDO Alliance to start work on interoperable standards for agentic commerce

The FIDO Alliance has announced initiatives to develop interoperable standards for agentic interactions and commerce, and it has a new…

 

Police policy on facial recognition use earns OK in Lawton, needed in Sante Fe

The Lawton, Oklahoma City Council approved a policy governing police use of facial recognition technology (FRT), moving the city closer…

 

EU recommends white label age verification app, but member states are wary

The European Commission really wants member states to adopt its white label age verification app – and quickly. This week,…

 

Amadeus unveils planned €1.2B Idemia PS acquisition to extend travel biometrics

Amadeus IT SA has officially declared its intention to acquire Idemia Public Security for 1.2  billion euros (approximately US$1.4 billion)…

 

Synthetic voice attacks challenge trust across platforms and systems

A parent has related an unsettling experience they had on Roblox. The father says he heard adults using AI‑generated child…

 

SendQuick selects Yoti to unify enterprise authentication with reusable digital ID

Mobile messaging firm SendQuick has selected Yoti to streamline enterprise authentication with reusable digital identity using FIDO2-based login infrastructure. The…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events