FB pixel

UK digital ID inclusivity can benefit from biometric bias testing consistency

Awareness of accessibility standard also needed, OfDIA says
UK digital ID inclusivity can benefit from biometric bias testing consistency
 

More than a quarter of digital identity service providers certified under the UK’s Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework (DIATF) were not even aware of the accessibility standard that they are expected to adhere to. Biometrics providers also do not assess bias the same way, which led to the addition of more specific testing requirements in the latest version of the trust framework (0.4).

This is a finding of the UK’s Office for Digital Identities and Attributes (OfDIA) in its second annual inclusion monitoring report. The report was originally published in November, and OfDIA’s advice drawn from it is shared in a blog post published Thursday.

OfDIA recommends that the government strengthen the accessibility rules in the DIATF, and that services make it easier to accommodate vouching.

More than half of services, 54 percent, reported meeting or surpassing W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (AA). But 27 percent said they were unaware of the requirement.

Service providers variously assess their biometrics for bias with operational testing, scenario testing and technology testing, in roughly equal measure, and 5 percent say they do not perform any bias testing at all. Several respondents admitted they did not know if any testing was done on their biometrics for demographic differentials. Face biometrics are the modality used by 92 percent of vendor respondents.

Internal testing based on an established standard was the most popular methodology, followed by external independent testing by an accredited test laboratory. Despite this only 30 percent have data on the accuracy rates of their technology with different demographic groups.

OfDIA also shared plans for improving the inclusion survey in 2025. They include new questions on whether reusable digital identities are offered, whether the service is cloud- or device-based, the average number of customers and checks conducted each month and how data on drop-outs or unsuccessful checks is collected.

The deadline for completing the 2025 survey is March 3.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Age assurance shouldn’t lead to harvesting of kids’ data: Irish privacy watchdog

Age assurance requirements for pornography sites and platforms hosting extremely violent content will become mandatory in Ireland this July. Media…

 

Idemia reveals Armenia JV details, Saudi Arabia MoU, WVU biometrics research lab

Idemia is busily establishing new partnerships to develop biometrics for national projects, from Armenia to Saudi Arabia, and to further…

 

EU SafeTravellers project works to secure biometric digital travel credentials

Idemia Public Security, iProov, Vision-Box and Ubiquitous Technologies Company (Ubitech) are part of a European Union-funded project to introduce traveler…

 

World puzzled by lack of public trust in massive technology corporations

Sam Altman and Alex Blania, figureheads and evangelists for cryptically related firms World and Tools for Humanity, recently spoke at…

 

Milwaukee police debate trading biometric data for Biometrica facial recognition

Although it has pledged to seek public consultation before signing a contract with a biometrics provider, the Milwaukee Police Department…

 

Italian regulator holds out hopes to collect fine from Clearview AI

Italy data protection regulator, the Garante, has not given up on collecting the millions of euros in fines it imposed…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events