FB pixel

Australia urged to cut stored data duplication, stand up digital ID commish

Consensus in responses to data retention review
Australia urged to cut stored data duplication, stand up digital ID commish
 

Australia’s government could make it easier for businesses to retain less data, meeting a goal it has set for itself, by instead requiring them to use a reliable identity verification method like the Australian Government Digital Identity System (AGDIS), stakeholders say.

The Law Council of Australia makes this argument in a submission responding to the latest update on the Commonwealth Data Retention Review. The Discussion Paper for the Data Retention Review was published by the Department of Home Affairs and the Attorney-General’s Department in February.

The principle of minimizing data retention requirements, particularly for personal information, is one of four proposed in the Discussion Paper.

Draft Principle 1 states that agencies should consider the necessity of data retention and minimize requirements for it as much as possible.

The Council approves of the proposal in Draft Principle 2 for limited periods to be specified for data retention provisions, which are needed for alignment with the Australian Privacy Principles enacted a decade ago.

Similarly, the Governance Institute of Australia sees the Government Digital ID verification system launch without reduced retention requirements as duplicating data handling.

“Where businesses have viewed or verified customer information through third party ID providers, the requirement to store this information should be abolished,” the Institute recommends in its response.

The body also argues that Australia needs a dedicated digital ID regulator, which would take responsibility from the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC).

The preference for AGDIS is also shared by the Property Council of Australia, which notes that its members are preparing for compliance with anti money-laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) reforms that kick in on July 1, 2026.

The OAIC published a new regulatory strategy for digital ID just weeks ago, which notes that “organizations collecting this information are often just as uncomfortable about holding ID documents as most people are about sharing them.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Broad biometrics adoption in new and established markets spurs investor action

The growth of biometrics in emerging industries like age verification and established ones like payments is dovetailing with the adoption…

 

Can facial age estimation save Roblox from more lawsuits?

Come January, if you want to chat in Roblox, you’ll need to let digital identity firm Persona estimate your age….

 

How commercial surveillance tools became essential to FBI investigations

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has come to rely on Clearview AI, Babel Street, and ZeroFox to support its…

 

Alaska seeks major AI overhaul of state services through myAlaska mobile app

Alaska is exploring a sweeping redesign of its statewide digital services platform, issuing a Request for Information (RFI) that signals…

 

No pints with digital ID or porn from Belize for UK revelers this Christmas

UK drinkers raising a glass to former Technology Secretary Peter Kyle this Christmas would best honour him with a glass…

 

African digital ID systems need better governance by stronger independent bodies: Researchers

Digital ID systems backed by biometrics are being imposed on Africans, preventing millions from receiving essential services they are entitled…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events