FB pixel

Australia urged to cut stored data duplication, stand up digital ID commish

Consensus in responses to data retention review
Australia urged to cut stored data duplication, stand up digital ID commish
 

Australia’s government could make it easier for businesses to retain less data, meeting a goal it has set for itself, by instead requiring them to use a reliable identity verification method like the Australian Government Digital Identity System (AGDIS), stakeholders say.

The Law Council of Australia makes this argument in a submission responding to the latest update on the Commonwealth Data Retention Review. The Discussion Paper for the Data Retention Review was published by the Department of Home Affairs and the Attorney-General’s Department in February.

The principle of minimizing data retention requirements, particularly for personal information, is one of four proposed in the Discussion Paper.

Draft Principle 1 states that agencies should consider the necessity of data retention and minimize requirements for it as much as possible.

The Council approves of the proposal in Draft Principle 2 for limited periods to be specified for data retention provisions, which are needed for alignment with the Australian Privacy Principles enacted a decade ago.

Similarly, the Governance Institute of Australia sees the Government Digital ID verification system launch without reduced retention requirements as duplicating data handling.

“Where businesses have viewed or verified customer information through third party ID providers, the requirement to store this information should be abolished,” the Institute recommends in its response.

The body also argues that Australia needs a dedicated digital ID regulator, which would take responsibility from the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC).

The preference for AGDIS is also shared by the Property Council of Australia, which notes that its members are preparing for compliance with anti money-laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) reforms that kick in on July 1, 2026.

The OAIC published a new regulatory strategy for digital ID just weeks ago, which notes that “organizations collecting this information are often just as uncomfortable about holding ID documents as most people are about sharing them.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Smart glasses and the new DHS surveillance budget

The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 budget justification lays out an expansive biometric and identity tech…

 

Voice AI expands attack surface for speaker biometrics as APIs proliferate

Deepfake voices are already a challenge for authentication systems. But the task is getting tougher, as big players pursue voice…

 

NetChoice wins in Arkansas, but faces forever war against age assurance

The battle over age assurance legislation in the United States has reached its next level. As the global tide turns…

 

UIDAI selects 20 bug bounty hunters to bolster India’s digital ID security

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) has launched a structured bug bounty program. The authority will open its core…

 

Netherlands gov’t, businesses fight digital fraud with ‘Anti-Phishing Shield’

Public authorities in the Netherlands and partners from the private sector, including internet service providers (ISPs), have jointly developed and…

 

Persona integrates with ConnectID for age checks through Australian payments network

Persona has announced an integration with ConnectID, the Australian digital identity exchange created by the country’s payments industry, Australian Payments…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events