FB pixel

Australian opposition politician challenges age checks for social media

Argues political speech rights of 15-year-olds violated
Categories Age Assurance  |  Biometrics News
Australian opposition politician challenges age checks for social media
 

Australia’s Digital Freedom Project holds that the country’s age restrictions for social media, and mandated age verification to prove eligibility, violate its constitution.

The group cites warnings of potential clashes between in the incoming age check requirements for social media platforms and the International Covenant on the Rights of the Child. The Australian Human Rights Commission recommended last November that the government consider “introducing a statutory duty of care for social media companies” instead of passing the legislative amendments to ban young users.

“We’re defending your rights online” the group declares on its website.

So who is “we?”

Digital Freedom Project is registered to John Ruddick, author of “Make the Liberal Party Great Again” and a Libertarian member of New South Wales Legislative Council. It argues that the amendments fail a proportionality test because measures practiced somewhere “overseas” provide “less restrictive and workable alternatives.”

A court proceeding has been launched by the group with a pair of 15-year-olds as plaintiffs. One of the 15-year-olds said: “Driving us to fake profiles and VPNs is bad safety policy. Bring us into safer spaces, with rules that work: age‑appropriate features, privacy‑first age assurance, and fast takedowns,” and invoked George Orwell’s dystopian classic, 1984.

He does not provide specific points of comparison with the book, and since children’s speech is not referred to at any point in the narrative, and the internet is not referred to, observers are left to parse a comparison between the control of social and political interactions in the book and the need for the plaintiffs to wait for up to a year to post on Insta.

Ruddick argues that the restrictions amount to Australia’s government attempting to parent the nation’s children. Australian parents support the changes by a ratio of more than 3-to-1, with 68 percent telling a Bastion survey at the beginning of the year they favor a ban on social media for children under 16.

He’s hoping for an injunction to prevent the enforcement of the age assurance requirements on social media platforms (and possibly chatbots) from taking effect on December 10, and turning to American Tech Giants with “a very open invitation to get behind our challenge” with financial support, The Sydney Morning Herald reports. Ruddick namechecks X Owner Elon Musk, whose platform requested a delay in the restrictions around the time allegations emerged of its AI chatbot creating child pornography.

The ban will drive teens to “an underground social media without parental supervision” Ruddick says.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

MOSIP Connect 2026 targets sustainability, practical use cases for digital ID

Sustainability and expansion are high priorities for the future of open-source national ID systems in discussions on the first day…

 

Ring Super Bowl ad sparks backlash over AI camera surveillance

A Super Bowl commercial for Amazon’s Ring doorbell camera triggered swift backlash, with critics arguing that the company used an…

 

Kids Off Social Media Act gains House backing as Senate advances bill

A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers led by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna have introduced the House companion to S.278, the Kids Off…

 

With NATO experiment, Reality Defender exposes military’s deepfake weakness

New content from deepfake detection firm Reality Defender looks at the company’s role in supporting NATO’s cognitive warfare experimentation. “In…

 

Corsound AI, IngenID partnership unites biometric voice intelligence offerings

A new strategic partnership brings together IngenID, which provides voice biometric SaaS, and Corsound AI, a voice intelligence and identity…

 

UK digital ID sector warns of legal action if mDL limited to GOV.UK Wallet

A spat is brewing in the UK between private sector digital identity providers and a government they fear is intent…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events