FB pixel

EU police can store biometrics with no time limit if processing rules followed

Court of Justice rules no national max needed for convict, suspect data retention
Categories Biometrics News  |  Law Enforcement
EU police can store biometrics with no time limit if processing rules followed
 

Law enforcement agencies can store biometric and genetic data from convicts and suspects in accordance with national and European laws, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has ruled. In addition, national law does not need to provide for a maximum period of storage “if it sets appropriate time limits for a review of the need to store those data,” the judgement notes.

The court case first started in the Czech Republic where a person identified only as JH objected to the identification procedure deployed by the local police. JH was questioned by the Czech police in 2016, during which officers took the suspect’s fingerprint and a genetic sample.

Despite being convicted by the court in Prague for several offenses, including misconduct in public office, JH filed a lawsuit in 2017 alleging that the police identification procedure constituted an “unlawful interference with his fundamental right to respect for private life.”

The suit escalated to the EU Court of Justice, which ruled in favor of the police on Thursday.

The court case was based on Directive 2016/680 of the European Union law, which states that processing the personal data of natural persons must respect fundamental rights and freedoms.

The judgment clarifies that the Directive does not preclude national legislation that permits the collection of biometric and genetic data of people accused or suspected of committing criminal offences. The law also permits the existence of national legislation under which the police assess the need for continued storage of biometric and genetic data.

The EU Court of Justice also added that convicts or suspects must have guaranteed rights and that “controllers must be required to comply with all of the principles and the specific requirements applicable to the processing of sensitive personal data.”

The decision was reached by the Fifth Chamber of the Court.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

ASEAN moves toward interoperable digital identity with verifiable credentials

The 11 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are among the world’s most active adopters of digital identity….

 

DHS biometric overhaul remains tied to Thales as HART deadline passes

Eight days after DHS was supposed to bring its long-delayed HART biometric system into initial operation, the department was still…

 

TikTok gave children placebo safety controls in undisclosed experiments, New York alleges

TikTok deliberately withheld algorithmic safety protections from millions of users and assigned tens of thousands of others, including children and…

 

Border biometrics move toward better gates, or none at all

The biometric technology needed for a new kind of border control is here. Travelers can already move through airports and…

 

ICE voter data, nonprofit investigations expose expansive surveillance machinery

Newly released records show U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) amassed tens of millions of voter records and investigated more…

 

ICE scraps visa vetting system recompete in favor of Palantir Foundry

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has canceled a planned competitive procurement for continued support of its Visa Security Program…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Biometric Update Podcast

Featured Company

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events