FB pixel

EU police can store biometrics with no time limit if processing rules followed

Court of Justice rules no national max needed for convict, suspect data retention
Categories Biometrics News  |  Law Enforcement
EU police can store biometrics with no time limit if processing rules followed
 

Law enforcement agencies can store biometric and genetic data from convicts and suspects in accordance with national and European laws, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has ruled. In addition, national law does not need to provide for a maximum period of storage “if it sets appropriate time limits for a review of the need to store those data,” the judgement notes.

The court case first started in the Czech Republic where a person identified only as JH objected to the identification procedure deployed by the local police. JH was questioned by the Czech police in 2016, during which officers took the suspect’s fingerprint and a genetic sample.

Despite being convicted by the court in Prague for several offenses, including misconduct in public office, JH filed a lawsuit in 2017 alleging that the police identification procedure constituted an “unlawful interference with his fundamental right to respect for private life.”

The suit escalated to the EU Court of Justice, which ruled in favor of the police on Thursday.

The court case was based on Directive 2016/680 of the European Union law, which states that processing the personal data of natural persons must respect fundamental rights and freedoms.

The judgment clarifies that the Directive does not preclude national legislation that permits the collection of biometric and genetic data of people accused or suspected of committing criminal offences. The law also permits the existence of national legislation under which the police assess the need for continued storage of biometric and genetic data.

The EU Court of Justice also added that convicts or suspects must have guaranteed rights and that “controllers must be required to comply with all of the principles and the specific requirements applicable to the processing of sensitive personal data.”

The decision was reached by the Fifth Chamber of the Court.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

STCon edges in among established facial recognition accuracy leaders in NIST 1:N

A handful of new facial recognition algorithms have been added to the NIST FRTE 1:N Identification this year, but most…

 

EC’s use case manual explains age verification with EUDI Wallet 

The European Commission has published an age verification Use Case Manual, showcasing how citizens will be able to prove they…

 

UK Fraud Strategy considers business digital identity and IDV 

In a new fraud strategy, the UK government is showing its commitment in fighting fraud and the way it has…

 

Turks and Caicos President unveils major digital transformation agenda

Prime Minister Charles Washington Misick of Turks and Caicos Islands says the government is undertaking a major digital transformation project…

 

Deepfakes force enterprises to rethink cybersecurity

Organizations must move beyond simple detection tools to defend against AI-generated impersonations and synthetic media attacks. As generative AI continues…

 

Are deepfakes already in your system? Learn how to find out, what to do

The threat that deepfakes pose to biometric onboarding processes is well known at this point. Less well understood, according to…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events