FB pixel

Vermont judge weighs jurisdiction claims in lawsuit against Clearview AI

Biometric data privacy case could be dismissed as digital scraping ignores borders
Vermont judge weighs jurisdiction claims in lawsuit against Clearview AI
 

The judge in a lawsuit filed by Vermont against Clearview AI over its collection of state residents’ face biometrics needs some time to consider the defendant’s claim that it should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

State Judge Daniel Richardson agreed with the argument of Clearview’s attorney that the company is not conducting business in the state in the normal sense of having contacted, contracted with or taken information directly from people in the state, MLex reports. But a recent case in which California’s data protection laws were found applicable to ecommerce site Shopify or another suit in Vermont involving Meta could provide a more useful precedence, a state attorney argued.

Judge Richardson noted that in both cases, the businesses had consumers in the state interacting with them directly. He will consider how the pre-digital standards for minimum contact and purposeful availment apply in the current case.

“Even looking at Meta, which I think moves the ball significantly forward in how we understand jurisdiction in an e-commerce or internet age, there’s still some underlying traditional principles of contact that I want to look a little bit closer at,” Richardson said, as quoted by MLex.

The lawsuit is Vermont’s third try at suing Clearview, filed earlier this year just as the company was settling multi-district litigation over biometric data privacy in federal court.  That settlement entitles the consumer class to a 23 percent stake in proceeds from a sale of the facial recognition company, but did not give state Attorneys General injunctive relief, and was opposed by 22 AGs.

Vermont Attorney General Charity Clark alleges Clearview violated the state’s Consumer Protection Act, and seeks an injunction forcing the company to delete its data, as well as restitution for consumers and civil penalties. Clearview filed its motion to dismiss the suit in June.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Will Scotland be the first nation to pass primary legislation covering live FRT?

The Scottish privacy commissioner continues to express consternation over the potential use of live facial recognition by Police Scotland. Meanwhile,…

 

France Identité app launches sandbox for iOS, proves age check privacy bona fides

France Identité, the French government’s mobile app for digital identity verification, has made its sandbox build available in iOS. Writing…

 

Digital ID success at scale hinges on tech, governance, adoption: IN Groupe

A study by French identity provider IN Groupe has established that digital identity systems succeed at scale only when countries…

 

New book makes case for DPI as fully integrated ecosystem

Digital development specialist Pedro Tavares has published a book that outlines how governments can successfully build digital states with digital…

 

Agentic AI pushes financial sector toward continuous identity

Agentic AI is forcing a rethink of identity and authentication in payments, as systems designed for human approval struggle to…

 

New Reality Defender Ethics Committee not mere theater, says CEO

“Most ethics committees are theater. This is not one of those.” So begins a new post from Reality Defender CEO…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events