FB pixel

AGs from 22 states and DC oppose Clearview’s biometric data privacy settlement

AGs from 22 states and DC oppose Clearview’s biometric data privacy settlement
 

A novel settlement of a class action biometric data privacy lawsuit by Clearview AI that would give a stake in the company to claimants is being challenged on its way to the finish line by nearly half of the states in the U.S.

The Attorneys General of 22 states and the District of Columbia have filed a motion for leave to file an Amici Curiae brief to explain their opposition to the settlement to U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman.

Vermont, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee and Washington.

The settlement was agreed to in June, and would give the class a 23 percent share in the company, which could be worth nearly $52 million in the case of a sale at a $225 million valuation reported at the time. It also includes an opportunity to claim a 17 percent share of Clearview’s revenue over the next two years.

Coleman gave the agreement preliminary approval on June 21, and plans to hold a hearing on Monday, December 16 to consider the Amici Curiae request.

The state AGs argue that the settlement does not provide injunctive relief – in other words, a mechanism to prevent the continuation of the harm cited — and therefore “is not fair, reasonable, and adequate.”  The plaintiffs also “failed to make a sufficient showing for why the highly unusual and speculative monetary recovery is adequate here.”

The filing also criticizes the 39 percent cut that goes to plaintiff’s attorneys under the agreement.

“The information and perspective that Amici States offer is critical to understanding the continued risk the proposed settlement poses to consumers,” the AGs argue.

Clearview has filed a motion to have the Amici Curiae briefs barred, on grounds that it is not timely, as the deadline for objections has passed. The states say the deadline does not apply to them, as they are not class members.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Liquid identity verifications surge past 60M as Japan leans into chip-scanning

Liquid has reached the 60 million digital identity verification milestone with its online KYC service, with a surge in verifications…

 

Car dealerships rev up digital ID verification to counter rise in identity fraud

Whether it’s a fake credit history, a phony license or a test driver with a stolen identity who makes tracks…

 

GovTech to deliver $10 trillion in value by 2034, says WEF

At the meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos this week, tech is front and center – and…

 

Davos discusses digital wallets, AI economy

This year’s Davos World Economic Forum (WEF) is bringing not only tense trade talks between the U.S. and Europe but…

 

ASEAN updates guidance on deepfakes

The threat of deepfakes is entering high-level discussions from Southeast Asia to Davos. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)…

 

Philippines faces 36 million backlog in ID cards

The Philippines are still facing a 36 million backlog in distributing the country’s national ID cards which will need additional…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events