FB pixel

AGs from 22 states and DC oppose Clearview’s biometric data privacy settlement

AGs from 22 states and DC oppose Clearview’s biometric data privacy settlement
 

A novel settlement of a class action biometric data privacy lawsuit by Clearview AI that would give a stake in the company to claimants is being challenged on its way to the finish line by nearly half of the states in the U.S.

The Attorneys General of 22 states and the District of Columbia have filed a motion for leave to file an Amici Curiae brief to explain their opposition to the settlement to U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman.

Vermont, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee and Washington.

The settlement was agreed to in June, and would give the class a 23 percent share in the company, which could be worth nearly $52 million in the case of a sale at a $225 million valuation reported at the time. It also includes an opportunity to claim a 17 percent share of Clearview’s revenue over the next two years.

Coleman gave the agreement preliminary approval on June 21, and plans to hold a hearing on Monday, December 16 to consider the Amici Curiae request.

The state AGs argue that the settlement does not provide injunctive relief – in other words, a mechanism to prevent the continuation of the harm cited — and therefore “is not fair, reasonable, and adequate.”  The plaintiffs also “failed to make a sufficient showing for why the highly unusual and speculative monetary recovery is adequate here.”

The filing also criticizes the 39 percent cut that goes to plaintiff’s attorneys under the agreement.

“The information and perspective that Amici States offer is critical to understanding the continued risk the proposed settlement poses to consumers,” the AGs argue.

Clearview has filed a motion to have the Amici Curiae briefs barred, on grounds that it is not timely, as the deadline for objections has passed. The states say the deadline does not apply to them, as they are not class members.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Japan moves toward age verification for social media filters and risk labels

Japan’s policymakers are considering their own version of age assurance for social media with content filtering taking the limelight. Nikkei…

 

AVPA plots course for age assurance future based on learnings from Australia

In 2025, few people on Earth logged as many travel miles as Iain Corby, the executive director of the Age…

 

Regula analysis finds ID document verification hardest for Arabic, Chinese, Japanese

While the Latin alphabet is the alpha and omega for around 40 percent of the world’s people, that still leaves…

 

London police win legal challenge against live facial recognition deployment

London’s Met Police force has won a legal challenge to its use of live facial recognition, allowing them to continue…

 

Roblox settles with Alabama, West Virginia, agrees to age checks for users under 16

Social gaming platform Roblox is settling its accounts. Having settled with the State of Nevada for $12.5 million over lawsuits…

 

YouTube offers its biometric deepfake detection tool to celebrities

After content creators, politicians and journalists, YouTube will also enable celebrities to access its likeness detection tool, allowing them to…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events