FB pixel

Clearview settles BIPA lawsuit, plaintiffs take 23% of company

Biometric data privacy class action threatens bankruptcy
Clearview settles BIPA lawsuit, plaintiffs take 23% of company
 

Settlements in biometric data privacy class action suits have taken several forms over the past several years, but a new agreement by Clearview AI takes the novel approach of giving plaintiffs a stake in the company in lieu of cash.

Now a class of plaintiffs who appear in Clearview’s database of images scraped from public-facing websites is set to receive 23 percent of the company, according to a court document hosted by Reuters. Based on a valuation of $225 million, the settlement would be worth about $52 million. Lawyers could collect up to 39.1 percent of that total, or roughly $20 million.

The unusual arrangement appears to be spurred by the financial straits of Clearview after defending itself in court, with the specter of a possible bankruptcy raised in the court filing.

“Clearview and the Class members were trapped together on a sinking ship: the potential liability was massive, there was no money for a substantial settlement, and the costs of litigation itself would bankrupt Clearview before the case ever got to trial, leaving nothing for the Class members,” plaintiffs say in their unopposed motion for an approval of the settlement.

Jon Loevy of plaintiffs’ representatives Loevy & Loevy told Reuters that the company “did not have anywhere near the cash to pay fair compensation to the class, so we needed to find a creative solution.”

The settlement agreement also gives plaintiffs the opportunity to claim 17 percent of Clearview’s revenues from the next two years. Another possible outcome is the class could sell its stake.

If approved by Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman of the Northern District of Illinois, notices would be posted to all of the online platforms plaintiffs’ images were scraped from, including Facebook, X (Twitter), Instagram and others.

A 2022 settlement between Clearview and the ACLU resulted in Clearview limiting its facial recognition business to official law enforcement and public sector contracts, and the establishment of new rules and an opt-out mechanism for its biometric database. The company’s legal representative told Biometric Update at the time that the deal represented “a huge win for Clearview AI.”

Clearview has continued to make progress in the law enforcement and government market, being added to a federal procurement marketplace in March and winning a contract in Dallas, America’s fourth-largest metropolitan area, just weeks ago.

Jim Thompson, Partner at Lynch Thompson LLP, tells Biometric Update in an emailed statement, “Clearview AI is pleased to have reached an agreement in this class action settlement.”

The settlement agreement received preliminary approval from Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman on Friday, June 21, 2024. 

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Calls for national standards grow as U.S. AI action plan takes shape

On February 6, the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Networking and Information Technology Research and Development National Coordination Office (NCO) issued…

 

DOGE’s influence at SSA triggers legal and congressional scrutiny

An affidavit in support of an amended complaint and motion for emergency relief to halt Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s…

 

UK Online Safety Act passes first enforcement deadline, threatening big fines

One of the main reasons regulations are not especially popular among ambitious CEOs is that they can cost money. This…

 

Digital ID, passkeys are transforming Australian government services

Tax has gone digital in Australia, where businesses now need to use the Australian Government Digital ID System to verify…

 

Biometrics ‘the lynchpin of where gaming companies need to be,’ says gambling executive

Online gambling continues to be a fruitful market for biometrics providers, as betting platforms seek secure and frictionless KYC, onboarding,…

 

Surveillance, identity and the right to go missing

By Professor Fraser Sampson, former UK Biometrics & Surveillance Camera Commissioner Do we have a right to go missing? The global…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events