FB pixel

DSP challenges Irish data regulator’s fine, says processing face biometrics is legal

Results of four-year investigation likely to drag out even longer, says expert
DSP challenges Irish data regulator’s fine, says processing face biometrics is legal
 

It’s knuckles up for Ireland’s Department of Social Protection (DSP), which is challenging a ruling by the Data Protection Commission (DPC) claiming it had no legal basis for the collection of biometric data as part of the process of issuing Social Protection Cards.

The biometric data in question is face biometrics, specifically biometric facial templates used for facial matching as part of the so-called SAFE 2 registration process required for a Social Protection Card application.

The DPC’s decision, which accuses the DSP of violating key provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), ended an investigation begun in July 2021. It comes with a fine of 550,000 euros (about US$585,000) and the order for the DSP to stop processing biometric data within nine months if it cannot identify a valid lawful basis for doing so.

Taking that time to find a legal reason to collect biometrics might seem like the easiest option for the DSP. Nonetheless, it has chosen to contest the ruling, launching High Court proceedings to argue that what it’s doing is, in fact, legal. Irish Legal News quotes a spokesperson for the Department of Social Protection, who says “the Department believes that its processing of biometric data is compliant with data protection law.”

Expert declares challenge a waste of time and money

It may take several years and hundreds of thousands of euros to find out who’s right. In the view of data protection expert Daragh O’Brien, who works for the Wexford-based firm Castlebridge, the effort amounts to a waste of time and funds.

“It would seem that rather than take the time generously allowed by the DPC to cure the issues identified in their unpublished decision that gave rise to the fine and enforcement notice, the department has opted to fight,” O’Brien says in a quote to the Irish Examiner. “I predict a long, drawn-out waste of taxpayer’s money on a battle that will wind up in the CJEU (Court of Justice of the European Union) with another loss for the State.”

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Japan moves toward age verification for social media filters and risk labels

Japan’s policymakers are considering their own version of age assurance for social media with content filtering taking the limelight. Nikkei…

 

AVPA plots course for age assurance future based on learnings from Australia

In 2025, few people on Earth logged as many travel miles as Iain Corby, the executive director of the Age…

 

Regula analysis finds ID document verification hardest for Arabic, Chinese, Japanese

While the Latin alphabet is the alpha and omega for around 40 percent of the world’s people, that still leaves…

 

London police win legal challenge against live facial recognition deployment

London’s Met Police force has won a legal challenge to its use of live facial recognition, allowing them to continue…

 

Roblox settles with Alabama, West Virginia, agrees to age checks for users under 16

Social gaming platform Roblox is settling its accounts. Having settled with the State of Nevada for $12.5 million over lawsuits…

 

YouTube offers its biometric deepfake detection tool to celebrities

After content creators, politicians and journalists, YouTube will also enable celebrities to access its likeness detection tool, allowing them to…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events