FB pixel

Reddit CEO weighs biometrics, passkeys for proof of personhood

Bot problem prompts musings about ‘lightweight’ methods for verifying a user is real
Reddit CEO weighs biometrics, passkeys for proof of personhood
 

There are various terms for the increasingly important ability to know if a real person is behind a virtual identity. Both “proof of personhood” (PoP) and “proof of human” (POH) have their advocates.

Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, has a different name for it.

“This idea of humanness, human verification – what I call ass in seat,” Huffman says, in an interview with TBPN. “Like is there actually a human using Reddit right now – regardless of the tooling you’re using.”

Reddit is weighing identity verification methods to combat its bot problem, and biometrics look like a good option. Huffman calls Face ID, Touch ID and biometric passkeys “the most lightweight way” to verify what may be called AIS.

In the passkey model, “a human has to touch or do or look at something,” he says. “That gets you pretty far” toward verifying that an end user is real.

Reddit’s model depends on anonymity, so Huffman is clear in stating that the platform wants to know if a user is a person – but not know anything about that person. He says there is an increasing need for firms that can provide a version of that service.

Reddit has previously floated the idea of enlisting World and its World ID for PoP.

Proof of humanness tied to larger discussions about digital selfhood

While some contenders have been steadfast in pursuing a biometric-based method for proving humanness, others have expanded the scope of their vision: Humanity Protocol recently pivoted toward verifiable credentials, and has been pursuing use cases in event ticketing following its acquisition of Moongate.

Reddit, meanwhile, is among large platforms navigating the global wave of online safety legislation imposing age assurance requirements on social media. Last month, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) fined Reddit 14.47 million pounds (about $19.55 million) for “serious failures in age assurance under UK data protection law.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Foundational ID and biometric binding underpin digital trust

Biometric fundamentals and foundational ID are considerations at the very beginning of the identity lifecycle that are sometimes overlooked. If…

 

ICE withdraws $125M sole-source Thomson Reuters surveillance data deal

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has withdrawn plans to award Thomson Reuters Special Services (TRSS) a five-year, $125 million…

 

TECH5 posts fastest search time in NIST IREX 10 iris evaluation

TECH5 has recorded the fastest search time in the current two-eye developer table of the National Institute of Standards and…

 

OCR Studio updates AI MRZ scanning for difficult remote ID captures

OCR Studio has updated its on-device software to scan the machine readable zones (MRZs) of passports, identity cards, visas, and…

 

Beyond accuracy: What NIST’s latest age estimation results mean for age assurance

The latest results of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST)’s Face Analysis Technology Evaluation Age Estimation & Verification…

 

Latest round of BixeLab biometrics evaluations include Level 3 PAD, IAD tests

A pair of facial recognition providers have passed Level 3 independent biometric Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) and Injection Attack Detection…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events