FB pixel

Reddit CEO weighs biometrics, passkeys for proof of personhood

Bot problem prompts musings about ‘lightweight’ methods for verifying a user is real
Reddit CEO weighs biometrics, passkeys for proof of personhood
 

There are various terms for the increasingly important ability to know if a real person is behind a virtual identity. Both “proof of personhood” (PoP) and “proof of human” (POH) have their advocates.

Steve Huffman, CEO of Reddit, has a different name for it.

“This idea of humanness, human verification – what I call ass in seat,” Huffman says, in an interview with TBPN. “Like is there actually a human using Reddit right now – regardless of the tooling you’re using.”

Reddit is weighing identity verification methods to combat its bot problem, and biometrics look like a good option. Huffman calls Face ID, Touch ID and biometric passkeys “the most lightweight way” to verify what may be called AIS.

In the passkey model, “a human has to touch or do or look at something,” he says. “That gets you pretty far” toward verifying that an end user is real.

Reddit’s model depends on anonymity, so Huffman is clear in stating that the platform wants to know if a user is a person – but not know anything about that person. He says there is an increasing need for firms that can provide a version of that service.

Reddit has previously floated the idea of enlisting World and its World ID for PoP.

Proof of humanness tied to larger discussions about digital selfhood

While some contenders have been steadfast in pursuing a biometric-based method for proving humanness, others have expanded the scope of their vision: Humanity Protocol recently pivoted toward verifiable credentials, and has been pursuing use cases in event ticketing following its acquisition of Moongate.

Reddit, meanwhile, is among large platforms navigating the global wave of online safety legislation imposing age assurance requirements on social media. Last month, the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) fined Reddit 14.47 million pounds (about $19.55 million) for “serious failures in age assurance under UK data protection law.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Face biometrics use cases outnumbered only by important considerations

With face biometrics now used regularly in many different sectors and areas of life, stakeholders are asking questions about a…

 

Biometric Update Podcast explores identification at scale using browser fingerprinting

“Browser fingerprinting is this idea that modern browsers are so complex.” So says Valentin Vasilyev, Chief Technology Officer of Fingerprint,…

 

Passkeys now pervasive but passwords persist in enterprise authentication

Passkeys are here; now about those passwords. Specifically, passkeys are now prevalent in the enterprise, the FIDO Alliance says, with…

 

Pornhub returns to UK, but only for iOS users who verify age with Apple

In the UK, “wanker” is not typically a term of endearment. However, the case may be different for Pornhub, which…

 

Europol operated ‘shadow’ IT systems without data safeguards: Report

Europol has operated secret data analysis platforms containing large amounts of personal information, such as identity documents, without the security…

 

EU pushes AI Act deadlines for high-risk systems, including biometrics

The EU has reached a provisional agreement on changes to the AI Act that postpone rules on high-risk AI systems,…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events