FB pixel

Facebook settles biometric face-tagging suit for $550 million

Facebook settles biometric face-tagging suit for $550 million

Facebook Inc. executives have said they will pay $550 million to settle accusations that the social-media icon stole and then used subscribers’ biometric data — specifically, face geometries. It is being called the largest privacy-related settlement to date.

The announcement came as a surprise to many listening to Facebook’s fourth-quarter earnings call Wednesday evening. Plaintiffs in the five-year class-action case claimed that Facebook violated the state of Illinois’ 2008 Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) by collecting the data.

Facebook maintains that it has done nothing wrong. Dave Wehner, the company’s chief financial officer, broke the news as he updated market analysts and journalists about the case during his quarterly financials telephone conference.

A company spokesperson later sent an email to reporters stating that executives wanted to put the case behind them in the interest of their shareholders and subscribers. Facebook shares fell almost 7 percent in the hours following the announcement Wednesday, according to MarketWatch.

Judge James Donato of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, who has presided of the case from the outset, must review the proposed settlement and decide if it is appropriate.

Under the Illinois law, companies must obtain written consent from people before deploying facial recognition to collect face-geometry information. Businesses face a penalty of $5,000 per violation or actual damages, whichever is greater, according to the American Bar Association.

The list of companies being taken to court under the state law is growing. Any firm acquiring and using biometric data, in any industry, is a potential target, according to the bar association.

In fighting Patel v. Facebook, the executives with the social-media giant vigorously defended its photo-labeling service, called Tag Suggestions. It had vocal allies, too, some of whom filed friend-of-the court briefs as the case proceeded.

The Security Industry Association was one of several similar groups trying to persuade judges of face-recognition’s merit.

In December, the Washington Legal Foundation filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court, urging the justices to accept Facebook’s petition that they review a Ninth Circuit decision allowing the class-action suit to move forward. Last week the Court declined to hear Facebook’s appeal.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News


Biometrics developers dance with data privacy regulations continues

Biometrics controversy and investments are often found side by side, as seen in many of this week’s top stories on…


EU AI Act should revise its risk-based approach: Report

Another voice has joined the chorus criticizing the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, this time arguing that important provisions of…


Swiss e-ID resists rushing trust infrastructure

Switzerland is debating on how to proceed with the technical implementation of its national digital identity as the 2026 deadline…


Former Jumio exec joins digital ID web 3.0 project

Move over Worldcoin, there’s a new kid on the block vying for the attention of the digital identity industry and…


DHS audit urges upgrade of biometric vetting for noncitizens and asylum seekers

A recent audit by the DHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) has called for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)…


Researchers spotlight Russia’s opaque facial recognition surveillance system

In recent years, Russia has been attracting attention for its use of facial recognition surveillance to track down protestors, opposition…


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events