FB pixel

Is the US getting serious about the trade in biometrics?

 

facial-recognition-database

Two bills have been introduced in the U.S. Congress to end what now is a free-for-all among police and intelligence agencies buying biometric data pertaining to Americans.

The Senate legislation, sponsored by Republican Rand Paul and Democrat Ron Wyden, takes direct aim at data brokers such as Clearview AI and Venntel who are collecting and selling information without the owners’ consent.

Wyden and Paul call out Clearview AI and Venntel by name in a media release promoting what they are calling the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act. The same legislation has been introduced by two Democrats in the House of Representatives; Zoe Lofgren from California and Jerry Nadler of New York.

Neither proposal addresses the collection or sales of biometric data between private entities.

A court order would be needed for government agencies to buy or otherwise accept biometric data such as face photos that the sponsors feel some companies gather “illicitly.”

They are referencing Clearview AI and its ilk, which scrape images indiscriminately from the internet, including from social media services. Facebook, Twitter and others expressly forbid this kind of behavior involving their subscribers’ accounts.

That rule would cover people in the United States and those outside the country.

But the bills go further.

Without a court order, data brokers like Venntel could not sell to the government location data collected from people’s smartphone service.

According to Wyden and Paul, it is illegal for app makers to sell the same data to the government today, but it is legal for them to sell it to brokers. Brokers, in turn, are allowed to sell the data to the government.

The legislation also would subject data infrastructure companies to the same privacy laws that regulate telecommunications firms, device makers and social media services.

Providers also would lose all civil immunity to comply with surveillance requests from the U.S. Attorney General’s office, except for when they are presented with a court order.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Facial age estimation spoof, VPN bypass claims called into question

Reports of the defeat of facial age estimation technology may be greatly exaggerated, and UK children have not flocked to…

 

Reddit users’ questions expose major shortcoming in age assurance effort

 “Am I the only one that’s confused about how they’re going to confirm if you’re a certain age?” So asks…

 

AI fraud threat continues to spur deepfake detection integration, investment, development

Reality Defender and 1Kosmos have announced a strategic partnership that will see the deepfake detection firm integrate its real-time deepfake…

 

iProov, Aware, Paravision power airport biometric boarding pilots at MCO

Airports across the Americas are accelerating their shift to biometric identity systems, with Orlando, Houston and Oklahoma City all rolling…

 

EU and Canada agree to collaborate on digital ID mutual recognition, pilots

Representatives of the European Union and Canada emerged from the meeting of the EU-Canada Digital Partnership Council on Monday with…

 

Ireland plants flag for child online safety as it prepares to assume EU presidency

Ireland may soon follow its neighbors in imposing age assurance requirements on adult content platforms. The Times says members of…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events