FB pixel

New York State called out for fuzziness added to ID proofing regs

New York State called out for fuzziness added to ID proofing regs
 

Remote online notarization is not the topic the biometric ID community would expect to generate much heat in 2023, but it has.

RON is the process and rules involved with getting something notarized remotely. It saves time and money and has engendered little if any controversy over the years it has been around.

One primary aspect to remote notarization is identity proofing, and that aspect could be changing in a way that it could be less secure.

The Kantara Initiative, standards-focused ID trade association, has posted a strongly worded letter from digital ID advisor and former Kantara board member Michael Magrath that can only be described as breathless with disbelief. Magrath is also the directory of identity policy and industry relations for Easy Dynamics Corporation.

The core of his argument with the New York Department of State amended its RON regulations giving vendors wiggle room when it comes to NIST’s identity assurance (ID proofing) level 2 standard. He says that that standard is tested and accepted, but it could be up for competition with recent changed.

Vendors commonly meet IAL2 by getting a government-issued ID scan and a selfie for biometric comparison.

Now, businesses can follow IAL2 or “any industry accepted standard that is at least as secure, or more secure, than that standard,” according to Magrath.

His quoted (and quotable) response: “Huh?!!”

The new option is ambiguous. Shouldn’t New York say that alternative has to be as good or better – as certified by a body of some repute? The new standard could be so different compared to IAL2 that security problems will emerge through the fault of the department of state.

It places a heavy load of liability on relying parties when most could use less.

There are other related changes likely in New York on the way, too, he says.

It is a fair question why a financial regulatory body in the state of New York, of all locations, seems to be opting for fuzziness.

Related Posts

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Canada regulator backs privacy-preserving age assurance

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) has published a policy note and guidance documents pertaining to age…

 

FCC seeks comment on KYC revision for commercial phone calls

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed stronger KYC requirements for voice service providers to prevent scams and illegal…

 

Deepfake detection upgrade for Sumsub highlights continuous self-improvement

Sumsub has launched an upgrade to its deepfake detection product with instant online self-learning updates to address rapidly evolving fraud…

 

Metalenz debuts under-display camera for payment-grade face authentication

Unlocking a smartphone with your face used to require a camera placed in a notch or a punch hole in…

 

UK regulators pan patchwork policy for law enforcement facial recognition

The UK’s two Biometrics Commissioners shared cautionary observations about the use of facial recognition in law enforcement over the weekend…

 

UK gov’t seeks covert surveillance tech in benefit fraud crackdown

The UK Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has published a £2 million (US$2.7 million) tender seeking software and hardware…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events