Bill 188 passes Florida Senate, looks to ban biometric collection in schools
Bill 188, which looks to ban the collection of biometric information from students in Florida, has now passed the full Senate.
“The risk of students’ personal information being lost or stolen through the collection and use of biometric data by schools, outweighs any benefit there might be in the schools using it,” Senator Dorothy Hukill, who spearheaded this bill said in a release. “We are protecting our students’ futures by ensuring the protection of their biometric information today.”
Earlier this year, the Bill passed its first committee with unanimous support.
Reported previously, a separate Senate bill was recently tabled in Maryland that would also see the collection of biometric information from students banned. This includes, not only biometric registration but also participation in other biometric programs including options for purchasing lunch in school cafeterias.
Bill 188 has been watched closely by the biometrics community, as the implication to business could be widespread.
“I’m concerned this precedent could spill over to other states due to mostly a lack of education on what these systems do or don’t do,” Janice Kephart, the founder of the Secure Identity & Biometrics Association (SIBA) and an outspoken advocate for the use of new authentication technologies said in an interview with BiometricUpdate. “It’s really concerning.”
SIBA has also released an official statement following the news that bill 188 had passed the Senate, saying that “the Senate vote is based on misunderstood science and penalizes the entire state because two districts out of 67 counties failed to follow simple and obvious program protocols. As a result, sensible biometric program implementation that includes these protocols in places like Miami-Dade are threatened because legislators believe that using biometrics to keep kids safe on buses and well fed in the lunchroom could lead to identity theft.”
BiometricUpdate.com has looked at the controversy surrounding biometric programs in schools through the lens of school cafeterias. Read the full feature here.
“It is a myth that identity theft and biometrics go hand-in-hand. Biometrics helps prevent identity theft. I should know. I drafted the digital federal criminal identity theft law signed by President Clinton in 1998 and used by federal prosecutors to go after identity thieves,” Kephart said in the official SIBA statement. “SIBA is a huge supporter of protecting identity, and biometrics are key to that.”
Also reported previously in BiometricUpdate, confusion around parental consent and the completion of a contract has prevented Stanley Convergent Security Solutions from deploying an iris-scanning pilot project for the Polk County School District in Florida.
Article Topics
Bill 188 | Florida | regulation | schools | SIBA
RT @BiometricUpdate: Bill 188 passes Florida Senate, looks to ban biometric collection in schools http://t.co/2gzcVpD9RQ #biometrics
@BiometricUpdate Thanks for quoting @janicekephart and @SIBAssoc! Lots of lessons in this story, not to make a bad pun! 🙂
FL Senatev votes to ban #biometric collection in schools (largely w/misinformation about tech) http://t.co/FGt09Wm9QR via @BiometricUpdate
FL Senatev votes to ban #biometric collection in schools (largely w/misinformation about tech) http://t.co/chPPT3TXEK via @BiometricUpdate v
The SIBA press release misprepresents the SB 188’s case against biometrics as being all about identity theft. In fact the anti-biometrics isn’t even mainly about identity theft! There are all sorts of problems with biometrics — they rarely work as advertised, vendors are secretive about performance, there are few standards for testing them, they cannot be cancelled and re-issued when stolen, they don’t work for everyone so they always need a backup etc etc — but the issue at hand in Florida and Senate Bill SB 188 is privacy.
Is palm scanning is a disproportionate response to the simple problems of lunch time queues and attendance on the buses? There are simpler (and cheaper) solutions to the problems that do not bring the side effects of biometrics, nor the security overheads needed to safeguard templates.
If the biometrics industry thinks awareness and education are the main obstacles to take-up, then I call on vendors to make public their error rates, test methods, and their false-negative-false-positive tradeoffs. Apple – held up as the model consumer biometric provider – has not published any meaningful security specs, and have refused to comment on the Chaos Compuer Club attack which proved iPhone “liveness detection” to be nonsense.