FB pixel

Plaintiff in biometric privacy class action asks judge to order Clearview AI to delete data

Plaintiff in biometric privacy class action asks judge to order Clearview AI to delete data
 

If Clearview AI loses access to facial images from social media after using them to train its biometric algorithm, is it still worth law enforcement’s trouble to use it? We may soon find out, as an Illinois resident who has taken the company to court for violating BIPA with its social media-scraping has requested a pre-trial order from a federal judge ordering Clearview to destroy the data of state residents it has stored, MediaPost reports.

“It has been revealed that defendants’ conduct is much more egregious — and their dangerous technology far more widespread — than was known when plaintiff commenced this action,” plaintiff’s lawyers said in documents filed this week in the Northern District of Illinois. Plaintiff David Mutnick is seeking a preliminary injunction forcing Clearview to stop collecting biometric data of Illinois residents and destroy that which it already holds. His lawsuit was filed in January.

The suit is just one of five federal class-actions being taken against the company, some or all of which could in theory be consolidated at some point, according to the report, including one recently filed in California, and a second BIPA suit.

In addition to law enforcement agencies across the U.S. and abroad, Clearview’s facial recognition has been used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), governments with atrocious human rights records like that of Saudi Arabia, and retailers, as well as an organization MediaPost describes as a “conservative think tank.” The revelations since the suit was filed necessitate the preliminary injunction, according to the complaint.

“Plaintiff and class members should not have to accept defendants’ lax attitude with respect to keeping their highly sensitive personal information secure,” Mutnick argues. “Given defendants’ lack of concern for data security and their new-found notoriety, it is extremely likely that defendants will experience additional and more severe data breaches, further injuring those whose data they wrongfully acquired in the first place.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Governments grappling with biometrics to ease airport, public service access

Many of the biometrics providers convening in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire for ID4Africa’s 2026 AGM got a first-hand look at how…

 

Biometric Update Podcast: Claire Ma explores the next phase of government digital identity

Governments around the world are moving toward digital identity systems, but not all are taking the same path. On the…

 

Trusted Caller ID with digital wallet and VCs improves call center authentication

Decentralized digital IDs shared from a digital wallet on a smartphone can significantly speed up identity verification by call centers,…

 

EES records 66M border crossings in first six months despite rollout friction

During its first six months of operation of Europe’s biometric-based Entry-Exit System (EES), daily fingerprint checks against EU databases rose…

 

IDDEEA outlines role of e-signatures in Bosnia’s digital transformation

Qualified electronic signatures (QES) have the potential to bring significant improvements to complex, fragmented public administrations like those in Bosnia…

 

Luxembourg opens tender for AI-generated content detection tool

Luxembourg’s Ministry of Digitalization has opened a call for solutions to develop a deepfake detection platform intended to support the…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events