FB pixel

Plaintiff in Onfido biometric data privacy suit argues against appeal of arbitration decision


biometric facial recognition

Onfido cannot force arbitration in a biometric data privacy lawsuit against it based on its partners terms of service, the plaintiff argued in a filing with the Seventh Circuit court reported by Law360.

The motion is in response to an appeal by Onfido of a lower court ruling that the company is not an intended third-party beneficiary of the terms of service provided by online marketplace OfferUp, and therefore not eligible to force arbitration.

The suit under Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) alleges violations of the Act’s informed consent requirements by Onfido in the course of providing its biometric customer authentication technology TruYou for OfferUp users.

Representatives of plaintiff Fredy Sosa argue in a brief that the district judge’s decision that the terms apply only to OfferUp and its customers, with no mention of third parties, and a structure that would not make sense applied to third parties. The brief notes that details are provided under the arbitration clause for how notice should be delivered to OfferUp and users, but not for how third parties should be informed.

Sosa also argues that Onfido is incorrect in asserting its right to invoke a Washington choice-of-law clause based on OfferUp’s terms, because it is not a signatory to those terms, and according to the briefing has not established that there is a difference between Washington and Illinois State law that would result in a different outcome. Further, Sosa did not agree that that law would apply to the dispute, the plaintiff claims.

The plaintiff’s brief asserts that it is “far from clear that Washington has the most significant relationship to the dispute at issue here: whether a Delaware company headquartered in California can enforce terms of service to which it is not a party in order to compel arbitration of an Illinois statutory privacy claim brought against it by an Illinois citizen.”

The case presents a contrast to the dispute over TikTok’s proposed $92 million biometric privacy suit settlement, in which plaintiffs are seeking to force arbitration.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News


Anticipation for Metalenz and Samsung’s answer to Face ID mounts

After Samsung and Metalenz collaborated to incorporate Samsung’s Isocell Vision 931 image sensor into Metalenz’s Polar ID imaging technology, Mashable…


Germany beefs up border security ahead of UEFA Championship

Germany has been ramping up security measures such as border checks and CCTV surveillance in preparation UEFA European Football Championship…


Inverid and Cybernetica team up to secure digital ID, signatures with biometric MFA

A new partnership has been formed by Inverid and Cybernetica to combine the NFC ID document-scanning capabilities of the former…


Vision-Box unveils new Service Design platform for travel experience enhancement

Vision-Box, an Amadeus company known for its biometrics-based travel offerings, has introduced its latest service innovation: Service Design, which aims…


Moldova’s first digital ID app sees 24K downloads in five days

Moldova’s first digital identity wallet was downloaded over 24,000 times within the first five days, causing temporary glitches due to…


Australia and Japan showcase cross-border verifiable credentials

In recent years, Australia and Japan have both launched digital identity initiatives allowing their citizens to verify themselves online. The…


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events