FB pixel

Has China beat the West to detailed AI governance rules?

Categories Biometric R&D  |  Biometrics News  |  Trade Notes
Has China beat the West to detailed AI governance rules?
 

A number of publications globally are reporting that China has approved its first AI industry ethics guidelines.

It is unclear if the guidelines — six principles — have the force of law. The government may have removed the document from public view, as it could not be found Monday on any site.

Multiple publishers have reported that China’s Ministry of Science and Technology published the New Generation Artificial Intelligence Ethics Specifications on September 27.

The guidelines are described in media reports as being among the more specific that have been enacted worldwide, but based on these descriptions, the rules still feel conceptual.

UK tech and business publication Verdict quoted a recommendation of the document as stating that artificial intelligence needs to be “people-oriented and follow the common values of mankind”; hardly the stuff of governance roadmaps.

The South China Morning Post, citing a Chinese document that its editors presumably have seen, reported that the guidelines put humans in control of AI algorithms, AI services and interactions with AIs.

Verdict reported that, along with keeping humans in the decision-making process, the document promotes “AI ethics and behavioural consciousness for the whole society.”

There is at least one other, seemingly more useful, ongoing AI ethics effort underway, this time in Europe. A private/public project has been launched in the Netherlands to see if an ethics tool can be used to mitigate risks involved in the deployment of facial recognition by law enforcement. The European Commission is also developing regulations around AI which could be used as a benchmark elsewhere, as has been the case for the bloc’s GDPR data protection regulation.

Given the Chinese government’s nationwide biometric surveillance network and its digital-identity Social Credit System, a black list that continuously scores citizens for their trustworthiness, the guidelines likely only apply to non-government systems use.

It is also safe to assume that any restraint imposed by Beijing on domestic AI and machine learning companies does not apply to systems aggressively sold by the same vendors overseas.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Australia credential register blocks 750,000 fraudulent ID checks post-Optus breach

Australia’s response to the Optus data breach has blocked 750,000 fraudulent identity checks, as a government register designed to prevent…

 

UK lawmakers prepare for contentious national digital ID, police biometrics bills

Digital ID is one of 12 priority area for the UK government that may merit a place in the traditional…

 

UK project uses supercomputers, synthetic data to improve emotion recognition

UK supercomputing power will be used to test a new facial emotion recognition system that relies on synthetic image data….

 

Frontex sets biometrics, AI research agenda for Horizon Europe 2028-2034

European border control agency Frontex plans to research and develop biometric verification and non-intrusive detection technologies as part of its…

 

Stop treating identity as a compliance step. It’s infrastructure now

By Harry Varatharasan, Chief Product Officer, ComplyCube The UK governmentʼs digital identity consultation is closing, and for most commentators, this…

 

If you build it, they will leave: experts warn UK gov’t on digital ID approach

The UK Cabinet Office’s consultation on digital identity closed on Tuesday, and individuals and organizations are sharing their responses. The…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Biometric Market Analysis and Buyer's Guides

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events