FB pixel

ID.me finds itself accused of biometric data privacy violation

ID.me finds itself accused of biometric data privacy violation
 

The state of Illinois’ biometric privacy law this week spawned another proposed class action. The plaintiff, a former health care worker, is suing identification verifier ID.me in the circuit court of Cook County and not her former employer, which hired the vendor.

Latisha Skinner is a former health care worker at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, according to trade publisher Law360.

Skinner claims that she was required in January 2020 by her employer to use an ID.me enrollment application that demanded either a face or voice print for future ID verification by the hospital.

According to Skinner’s suit, she created and uploaded a picture for use as a face print.

At that time, ID.me’s policies called for data deletion 7.5 years after an ID.me account was closed, while Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act mandated destruction after three years.

The vendor subsequently revised its retention and deletion rules to reflect its clients’ needs up to three years unless it is required to do otherwise by the government, according to Law360. A spokesperson for the vendor told the publication that the case is without merit.

Skinner’s lawsuit wants the maximum damages of $1,000 for each BIPA violation.

The highest-profile cases filed under the act to date have pursued the businesses that have used face and fingerprint biometric ID verification systems. Google, as with so many things, is an exception.

ID.me is already tied up in a number of ID verification-related headaches.

The U.S. Senate wants the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the company because it allegedly mislead the government about its service.

And it is still reeling from backlash involving its contract with the Internal Revenue Service. Taxpayers came under the impression that they had to submit a face scan to collect tax refunds. That is not what happened but public perception of ID.me was heavily influenced by the resulting furor.

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

From verifying humans to AI agents: Socure prepares for the next identity challenge

Fraud has evolved alongside digital identity, from stolen credentials and account takeover to synthetic identities, deepfakes and AI-generated documents. Identity…

 

Meta smart glasses patent reignites facial recognition debate

Meta’s latest smart glasses patent offers a glimpse of a future in which cameras do more than record what their…

 

Amazon Rekognition faces scrutiny in false arrest lawsuit

Amazon Web Services (AWS) was added as a defendant in a federal lawsuit brought by a St. Louis, Missouri man…

 

USSOCOM advances smartphone iris biometrics toward field testing

U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) is preparing competitive testing of technology that could turn commercial Android phones and tablets into…

 

Foundational ID and biometric binding underpin digital trust

Biometric fundamentals and foundational ID are considerations at the very beginning of the identity lifecycle that are sometimes overlooked. If…

 

ICE withdraws $125M sole-source Thomson Reuters surveillance data deal

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has withdrawn plans to award Thomson Reuters Special Services (TRSS) a five-year, $125 million…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Market Intelligence

Featured Company

Biometric Update Podcast

Most Read This Week

White Papers

Latest Webinars

Biometrics Industry Events