FB pixel

Virginia and Arkansas in US moving age verification bills closer to reality

Virginia and Arkansas in US moving age verification bills closer to reality
 

Another pair of U.S. states are debating laws designed to require proof of age before someone can enter a site with some amount of content considered harmful to minors.

Arkansas and Virginia are following Louisiana, which enacted a similar age verification law earlier this year.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit association and government watchdog advocating for civil liberties online, has responded to the trend by saying anonymity online is disappearing.

Virginia’s legislation is a signature away from being law while the Arkansas bill has passed the Senate and House. After reconciliation between the two chambers, which is considered a formality, it, too, will go to the governor for a final signature.

Virginian ages would have to be proven using a digital or physical government ID or an age verification service rated at least ID assurance level 2, according to the regional news publisher the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. IAL2 can include biometrics, but does not require them.

Age verification would be required for any site that is more than one-third harmful to minors (in these cases under the age of 18 years) and that is owned by a business located in Arkansas. What qualifies as harmful is spelled out in the bill but is generally defined as content that lacks serious literary, artistic, political, and scientific value for minors.

The bill passed the Senate 77-4 with 14 politicians voting “present.”

The Virginia legislation passed with similarly lopsided votes, according to regional news publisher the Virginia Mercury.

Again, would-be viewers would have to show their government ID, biometrics or a positive result using a commercial age verification application.

Civil liberty arguments aside, the laws require states or companies acting for the state to collect and verify personally identifiable information including face scans, and that has upset people beyond the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Virginia’ Sen. Bill Stanley has said age verification for businesses is easy. Other proponents of the bill have said personal information does not need to be held by a business involved in a verification transaction.

And, said Stanley, “I’m pretty confident that it will not put users’ personal information at risk.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

European AI compliance project CERTAIN launches

The pan-European project to create AI compliance tools CERTAIN has kicked off its work, with the goal of making European…

 

Signaturit Group acquiring Validated ID for undisclosed sum

Spain-based digital identity and electronic signature provider Validated ID is being acquired by Signaturit Group, a European company offering identity…

 

Social media ban for kids under 13 advances through US Senate committee

U.S. kids under 13 could soon be banned from accessing social media platforms, as an age assurance law makes its…

 

South Africa will invest in DPI, says President

South Africa is planning to invest in digital public infrastructure (DPI) , including the launch of a national digital identity…

 

Sri Lanka: ‘DPI is not just a buzzword’

A robust digital public infrastructure (DPI) framework is central to Sri Lanka’s ongoing digital transformation, while the country’s digital ID…

 

Idiap highlights biometrics research, open-source contributions for 2024

Idiap Research Institute has released its 2024 Scientific Report. Its research covers a wide range of digitally relevant topics, several…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Viewed This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events