FB pixel

Outgoing UK commish leaves advice for law enforcement use of biometrics and drones

Outgoing UK commish leaves advice for law enforcement use of biometrics and drones
 

Professor Fraser Sampson, who recently announced that he will step down as the UK’s Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner at the end of October, has offered some final counsel on regulating uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) – better known to most as drones.

The results of a survey Sampson conducted found that, while “police forces in the UK routinely use drones equipped with high-definition cameras, night vision or thermal imaging capability” for a variety of surveillance activities, most forces using them could not say which make or model they were using, or how long they had been in use.

“Forces were uncertain of the security risks around the use of UAVs and what protocols they have in place to mitigate them,” says the summary.

The findings are of particular concern in light of Sampson’s larger questions about data security in law enforcement. In a recent response to a consultation by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) on the governance of biometric data, Sampson cited “recently-reported data breaches from police forces around the UK,” which have “underscored the continuing need for vigilance and scrutiny around data storage policies, practices and remedies.”

On the question of drones, Professor Sampson lands on much the same conclusion he does with regards to biometric regulation – namely, choose your friends wisely.

“Guidance needs to be made available to forces on the procurement and deployment of surveillance technology from companies whose trading history and engagement with accountability frameworks has raised significant concern,” Sampson wrote, also calling for increased accountability measures from police and municipal bodies.

The outgoing commissioner says he is leaving his post for personal reasons. But he has made known his belief that the biometrics commissioner would be rendered irrelevant by the passing of the UK’s Data Protection and Digital Information Bill.

Sampson has advocated for biometric regulations that cast a wide net across sectors, methods and technologies. He recommends establishing “a set of clear, indefeasible principles by which agencies will be held transparently and auditably to account for their use of biometrics.”

Article Topics

 |   |   |   |   |   | 

Latest Biometrics News

 

Cybercrime and identity fraud: an Olympic challenge

By Grigory Yusupov, Regional Director UK and Rest of the World (ROW) at IDnow The Paris 2024 Olympics is set…

 

IDV providers respond to growing consumer demand for stronger fraud prevention

A range of digital identity and financial fraud prevention capabilities and solution updates have been released just as Veriff issues…

 

Biometrics developers dance with data privacy regulations continues

Biometrics controversy and investments are often found side by side, as seen in many of this week’s top stories on…

 

EU AI Act should revise its risk-based approach: Report

Another voice has joined the chorus criticizing the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, this time arguing that important provisions of…

 

Swiss e-ID resists rushing trust infrastructure

Switzerland is debating on how to proceed with the technical implementation of its national digital identity as the 2026 deadline…

 

Former Jumio exec joins digital ID web 3.0 project

Move over Worldcoin, there’s a new kid on the block vying for the attention of the digital identity industry and…

Comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Most Read This Week

Featured Company

Biometrics Insight, Opinion

Digital ID In-Depth

Biometrics White Papers

Biometrics Events